Bjornar Moxnes
Stem Rødt og Felix Unger Sörum
Honestly I feel the Flames need to move on from Monahan. What are your offers?
Unrealistic, Flames dont jave the cap space for Toews and he's not going to waive to Calgary regardless of if he's mad at Bowman or notMonahan for Toews
I'll trade you Monahan for Danault, Byron and Tatar.
It's a bad offer but gotta get the bidding started somewhere.
Oof 2 rentals and a cap dump. Flames don't have the cap space for that either. Maybe if you take on Looch we'll take Byron backI'll trade you Monahan for Danault, Byron and Tatar.
It's a bad offer but gotta get the bidding started somewhere.
Oof 2 rentals and a cap dump. Flames don't have the cap space for that either. Maybe if you take on Looch we'll take Byron back
there is no way one of Suzuki/JK arent the primary piece going back lol
What? Why? Trading Monahan and not packaging on other assets to upgrade to a better 1C is stupid. The team doesn't have any replacements for him and they just spent a lot in FA to signify they aren't planning on rebuilding either. There is no legitimate return out there for him since no one is going to offer a better 1C and he can't be replaced internally. Every single offer here is going to be horrible.
I know it was a joke, this post was also amusing. As I said at the very beginning there just isnt a realistic trade involving Monahan and especially after commiting to Markstrom.I'd do it if you throw on Andersson. I'd have to add Caufield to make it fair but you'd also want Armia too which I'd counter with you throwing in Kylington if we add Juulsen and I'd want you to add...
Nah, I think you took my initial joke post too seriously, I get not trading him for scraps.
He's no less a #1 center than Wild Bill or Duchene. And Vegas are considered cup favorites. There's not a single team in the league offering an upgrade on Monahan. If you want a better 1C you have to deaft them or grab them in free agency. Getzlaf is the only 1C actually hitting free agency any yime soon and hes 35. 2 years from now they can let Gaudreau walk to test their luck with Zibanejad, Couturier, or Barkov. But none seem likelyMonahan is not a number 1 center. That's the first problem here.
That’s not a bad offer. I’m probably in the minority but I’d do that in a heartbeat. Danault is about equal to Monahan at this point, Byron would be amazing in our bottom 6 and flip Tatar to the highest bidder. I’m all for it.I'll trade you Monahan for Danault, Byron and Tatar.
It's a bad offer but gotta get the bidding started somewhere.
That’s not a bad offer. I’m probably in the minority but I’d do that in a heartbeat. Danault is about equal to Monahan at this point, Byron would be amazing in our bottom 6 and flip Tatar to the highest bidder. I’m all for it.
Montreal gets fleeced in a deal like that. Danault on his own is better than Monahan.I'll trade you Monahan for Danault, Byron and Tatar.
It's a bad offer but gotta get the bidding started somewhere.
I understand, I’m sure we can extend. If not just trade them again. Will still end up getting more value than we would for Monahan alone.Two of those are on expiring contacts eh? Signed maybe it's workable, currently it rips Calgary off
Why would they move on from a young scorer on a good contractHonestly I feel the Flames need to move on from Monahan. What are your offers?
That’s not a bad offer. I’m probably in the minority but I’d do that in a heartbeat. Danault is about equal to Monahan at this point, Byron would be amazing in our bottom 6 and flip Tatar to the highest bidder. I’m all for it.
That’s not a bad offer. I’m probably in the minority but I’d do that in a heartbeat. Danault is about equal to Monahan at this point, Byron would be amazing in our bottom 6 and flip Tatar to the highest bidder. I’m all for it.
Two of those are on expiring contacts eh? Signed maybe it's workable, currently it rips Calgary off