LONDON KNIGHTS vs. U MINNESOTA

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by derbyfan, Dec 11, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. derbyfan

    derbyfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    In light of the Knights remarkable streak this year, I thought this would be a fun comparison. I know there's some serious trash talk on these boards between NCAA and CHL fans, but I'd like to hear opinions on who'd come out on top between the CHL's #1 squad and the NCAA numero uno.
    Obviously, Minnesota has a big age advantage. They also have more drafted players on their roster than London. Could the Knights hold their own against and older squad such as the Gophers? It'd be a fun game to watch.
    Let's hear some opinions... ;)
     
  2. Freaky Habs Fan

    Freaky Habs Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New-Brunswick
    Home Page:
    Basing my opinion on the teams name, London could crush Minessota. I mean, the Gophers...What the hell!?!? :D
     
  3. Blind Gardien

    Blind Gardien nexus of the crisis

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Space Goat
    Location:
    Four Winds Bar
    Is it because Minnesota might be a bit younger than some other NCAA powerhouses? I dunno, I haven't seen them this year. I saw Michigan on TV there though, and if the question is more like "could NCAA powerhouse X take the Knights"... oh yeah, I give it to the NCAA powerhouse. The age gap cannot possibly be overlooked. London has been powerful, but I'm yet to be convinced that they are really as powerful in an all-time historic sense as their record indicates.
     
  4. Jason MacIsaac

    Jason MacIsaac Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,155
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    NWO RCN
    Location:
    Halifax, NS
    Minnesota would pound the Knights. Minnesoda has some 21, 22 and 23 year olds. They would be playing a bunch of teens.
     
  5. Hobey Baker

    Hobey Baker Registered User

    Joined:
    May 27, 2004
    Messages:
    7,239
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    dude
    Location:
    Charlestown
    Home Page:
    Minnesota would likely dominate the Knights in a series....That would be the best gauge: a 7-game series.
     
  6. SPORTSMANIAC

    SPORTSMANIAC Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,588
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Lewiston, Maine
    Home Page:
    In Lewiston people been talking wat if Mainaics played UMaine? First two different styles of play and rules are differently in some ways. Then they said a seven game series most people said UMaine would win in 6 or seven. Another thing is a CHL rookie is 16-17 CHL verteran is 19-20 NCAA rookie is 18 NCAA Senoir is 21 or 22. So NCAA has the age advantage and experience. I would go with UMinn over London Knights in seven.
     
  7. Form and Substance

    Form and Substance Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Messages:
    5,670
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But what the CHL lacks in experience it makes up for in overall talent.
     
  8. Jason MacIsaac

    Jason MacIsaac Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,155
    Likes Received:
    353
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    NWO RCN
    Location:
    Halifax, NS
    So a team like North Dakota who has:

    Zajac
    Stafford
    Murray
    Smaby
    Schneider
    Porter
    Massen
    Jones
    Greene

    All these players were drafted to the NHL.....plus they are much older then the potential draft picks playing for London. North Dakota isn't even the best team in the country.
     
  9. Kritty

    Kritty Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Why does everyone equate age to being better? Just because a player is older it means nothing. Look at Crosby. Most would say he is arguably the top player under 20-21 range and he is only 17 right now. Yes, older players have advantages, but that should not be the sole reason why a team would win.
     
  10. bruins4777*

    bruins4777* Guest

    skill: london
    experience: minny
    overall winner: london in my opinion.

    Its two different styles, two different leagues.

    Age doesn't really matter to me as much, but minny might be more disciplined? I dunno it would be fun to see though.
     
  11. Jakethesnake

    Jakethesnake Registered User

    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sydney
    Home Page:
    the difference between a 17 and a 23 yr old is about 30 pounds. 23 yr olds are men who would have no trouble physically dominating and mandhandling 17 yr olds. the gophers physical dominance will lead to them thrashing london.

    not only that, but if you were a gopher, there is no way you would let a team filled with younger players beat you. the gophers would never let it happen
     
  12. Lard_Lad

    Lard_Lad Registered User

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    6,678
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kelowna
    Home Page:
    No CHL team will have much of a chance against a team that can afford to use Kris Chucko in a limited role.

    Let the Knights add in a few guys that graduated from them in the last couple of years, though, to make up the age difference, and it's another story.
     
  13. J17 Vs Proclamation

    J17 Vs Proclamation Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,025
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    College baby!
    Location:
    Reading.
    The Knights have by far the better players down the line. In 5 years time the guys from London would murder the guys from the Minny. Pherhaps the only reason they wouldn't win now is the age gap. London would probably be physical outplayed butwith the amount of skill they got i'd say could win.
     
  14. BuppY

    BuppY xGoodwillx

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    16,318
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    Rick Nash!!!!!!!!! lol Knights win easily if he is in the line-up. :bow:
     
  15. Rabid Ranger

    Rabid Ranger 2 is better than one

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    23,187
    Likes Received:
    1,035
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Occupation:
    Contract manager
    Location:
    Murica

    This of course has nothing to do with this thread. London, RIGHT NOW, would be beat by Minnesota, based mainly on the age/maturity factor, but also because they have an excellent team, especially in goal and on the blueline.
     
  16. Sammy*

    Sammy* Guest

    Exactly. They would crush them.
    Every year the U of A Bears plays the Oiler rookies who are drafted by the Oilers (ie. they are likely between 18-21). Now the Oiler rookies would be older than the Knights (& probably better since they are good enough to get drafted, which not alot of Knghts would be) & the Bears time & time again crush the rookies. So given that, I would bet it would be even worse for the Knights.
     
  17. Bookman

    Bookman Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,472
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    frozen north
    Home Page:
    How about college all-stars vs. junior all stars in a best of 7?
     
  18. MN_Gopher

    MN_Gopher Registered User

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    Messages:
    3,621
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    medical
    Location:
    Mpls
    Home Page:
    Going with the age thing, Reinholz is a 79 b day.

    I would say a good way to eval is when guys like Stafford, Goligoski, Hagemo all play in the junior tournament. Then realize that Stafford last year was not the best player one his team or top 3 forwards on his own team. Then it should be comprable. See how good Stafford was in the tourney then realize he was second line in NoDak.

    The other thing the NCAA has in its favor is some teams fourth line. The gophers fourth line of Fleming, Smaagard and X player. Can play with the best of them. These guys are college seniors. Probally 21-22 years old. They would take advantage of younger players. They can stop the best of em(in the NCAA) and still score a few here and there. They have played more hockey and are smarter role players then most teen agers.
     
  19. derbyfan

    derbyfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    The discussion of the physical element I find interesting. If you go to the NHL Central Scouting website, they list the average height/weight for each junior and college team. On average, the major junior teams are bigger, some by a considerable margin.
    Is the biggest difference the KNOWLEDGE of how to use that size advantage? The fact that at 17/18 you still aren't as comfortable with your body as a 21-22 year old?
     
  20. goteam

    goteam Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    Home Page:
    A few years ago, the Saskatoon Blades played an exhibition game against the University of Saskatchewan Huskies. Many people gave the exact same predictions as on here. However, the Huskies ended up beating the Blades some like 14-2, it was like watching men against boys. And no this was the Blades team from last year, it was in the late 80's or early 90's IIRC - so it wasn't like the Blades were that bad of a team, it's just that the level of college hockey is that good, be it CIS or NCAA.
     
  21. Tricolore#20

    Tricolore#20 PK PK PK

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2003
    Messages:
    8,255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Toronto
    Home Page:
    That's no surprise really. Most CIS teams consist of players who played in the WHL. I think all the players on the U of A Golden Bears this year played at the WHL at some point. You add the age and experience to these players, and they'll of course be better than they were in junior.
     
  22. derbyfan

    derbyfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Just a thought, but shouldn't CIS teams fare better against their NCAA competition then? Our squads routinely get thrashed when they play American schools. Considering they're made up of former major junior players, I'd think they'd be able to beat most schools, considering they're of equal age and size... :dunno:
     
  23. VOB

    VOB Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Home Page:

    You are right derbyfan, on average the CHL players are bigger, heavier and for the most part stronger. Age really doesn't come into play that much. Witness the yearly thumping Team Canada hopefuls (comprised of 17, 18 and 19 year old CHLers) give to University allstar teams who are between the ages of 20 to 25.

    I for one would love to see such a game, I think it would surprsie a whole heck of alot of people.
     
  24. VOB

    VOB Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Home Page:
    One its called conditioning. CIS teams do not do much of any dry land training and basically get into game shape during the course of the season. NCAA teams come to camp in shape and ready to play. Last year Western Michigan played both Western Ontario and Wilferd Laurier in December and the games were very close. It took an empty net goal to secure Western Michigan's win over Western Ontario. The conditioning advantage had by December decreased to a very small edge compared to the chasm that it is in early October.

    Two, most CIS teams feature former CHL players who were at best second and third line players and bottom paring Dmen. So the CIS/NCAA exhibition games are not very indicitive of the talent levels between the CHL and the NCAA. Teams from out east and a few from out West (such as the Golden Bears) tend to take the better former CHL players and they have more success against NCAA competition because of it.
     
  25. derbyfan

    derbyfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Thanks, VOB. The scores I've seen on the USCHO website have often left me shaking my head in disbelief. On the surface, it seems a very strong argument for the NCAA being stronger. Many of these NCAA squads are comprised of former Canadian Junior "A" players who are supposed to be inferior to their M.J. counterparts.
    If I'm not mistaken, VOB, you're a Michigan resident. How do you feel Plymouth, Saginaw and the like would fare against Michigan NCAA schools? I know Wayne State and the Whalers play out of the same building...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"