justafan22
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2014
- 11,629
- 6,249
Well if that's what we're offering, we can forget Pietrangelo.
But Muzzin and/or Gudas are possible.
Liljegren not doing that well now? seems like his hype has been a seesaw... Massive hype before draft, then hype dropped at draft, then HUGE hype again when Leafs drafted him and now hype is low again
Gudas isn’t on the same level as the others.
I highly doubt Fletcher moves Gudas for Brocco or Rosen. The team is transitioning away from small players with minimal upside. Got rid of 2 this week; Weal and Leier. Not saying Brocco is like them, but he won’t have much of a future with our crop of F prospects. Same thing goes with Rosen and our D prospects.
Gladly take a 2nd and 3rd for Gudas. Hell, if Liljegren or a 1st is in play for Gudas, which I highly highly doubt, that would be awesome.
Looks like it's going to be a rental.
Picks are picks. I don’t think the differential in years is something that would make a deal go sour. I may be wrong though.a 2nd + 3rd for Gudas is fine, as long as the picks are over 2 years. Leafs can't afford to deal back to back rounds in 2019.
Dubas is evidently looking for a top 4 RD with term so I could see Lily being available but the player has to have 2+ years left on his contract.
Well if that's what we're offering, we can forget Pietrangelo.
But Muzzin and/or Gudas are possible.
Liljegren not doing that well now? seems like his hype has been a seesaw... Massive hype before draft, then hype dropped at draft, then HUGE hype again when Leafs drafted him and now hype is low again
Picks are picks. I don’t think the differential in years is something that would make a deal go sour. I may be wrong though.
2019 2nd
2020 3rd
Or does TOR not have one of those?
Well if that's what we're offering, we can forget Pietrangelo.
But Muzzin and/or Gudas are possible.
I don’t really see a difference lol. That’s fine with me.They do, but they've dealt 2nd rounders in back to back drafts. 2020 2nd and 2019 3rd would be preferable.
If not, can replace a prospect instead or lower the 2019 pick to a 2nd and improve the prospect.
Agreed, gotta be a long term piece.Yeah, I wouldn't trade Liljegren for either of these guys, has to be in the Parayko range for a package.
Not sure it’s that as much as the fact he’s been banged up and now passed over on the depth chart by Rasmus Sandin.Liljegren not doing that well now? seems like his hype has been a seesaw... Massive hype before draft, then hype dropped at draft, then HUGE hype again when Leafs drafted him and now hype is low again
Not sure it’s that as much as the fact he’s been banged up and now passed over on the depth chart by Rasmus Sandin.
Your interpretation seems to go along with projections, though. He was always kind of a boom or bust prospect so it seems fitting to see sentiment from both ends of the spectrum.