Bern, you are out of your mind. The parts you are asking for are known to be untouchable to Holland, and the players you are offering aren't close to the caliber it would take to get those pieces anyway. We don't need to deal with the Rangers, and if that is your prices, nobody else will either.
NY [nor any other team for that matter] does not have to capitulate to Holland on what it wants.
The title of this thread is likelihood of Oilers acquiring F help.
They may bet crap at his prices, but real help will cost.
And nuts to those of you who want to throw it in my face for telling that like it is.
Didn’t you say last year that Namestnikov was worth a 1st? I think this is the problem people have - the value you place on the players.
It’s kind of odd that you keep trying to turn a simple trade into a much bigger one, when there isn’t any indication that would be desired from either side. Just because you add more players doesn’t mean a team would be willing to give up much better assets over more of the lesser assets.
But I mean it seems pretty clear the Oilers probably aren’t too interested in giving up their 1st for Howden, and I’m sure Strome at that price isn’t too appealing. He’s done well this year, of course, but I think it would be a wait-and-see for most teams on him.
I expected more from Buchnevich this year, so I don’t think he would be too attractive at that price either.
If those are the prices for those players, I believe the Oilers would easily pass on all three, personally.
Underline: if you wish to pass at those prices, I respect your right to do so. No deal if we are not in a certain ballpark.
As to Namest, at one pt I did seek a 1st but that was shortly after we acquired him since Stevie Y insisted GMJG do Miller for Namest, [presumably he would have killed the McDonagh deal if not]. Ok, they didn't have the improved prospect depth they have now, so they played him a bit. I wanted a 1st for him THEN on the basis of demonstrated track record w/Stamkos suggesting he might be a match with higher end linemates. We then gave him a deal at 4 per so he would not walk and I wished we'd have dropped price on him to a 2nd to move him. Making the best of a bad situation, I think I was looking at him + a 2nd + something else for a late 1st.
Finally, with no takers, I said, just please, now we really need to recover the cap, let him go for a 5th, a 6th --- just get rid of him.
Don't recall the timeline but I think most of last yr if not more I was there, going for the giveaway to recover cap, and not seeking a higher pick.
However, my pt was if you want a guy like Namest, who is clearly a stopgap and not a build move, that's the type of player you get at these Holland prices.
And we require profit on our assets . See how that works ?
I said clearly in post 87:
Every team has guys...
they'll pay you to take
or will take less than max due to cap or other reason
or will accept market
or want a profit/premium
While my ask is the high end of market on those 3, I consider them market prices.
Only the NYR can make a profit on their players . Everyone else has to take scraps for the Rangers . At least according to Bern
Again per post 87, which you ignore
every team has guys with dif values
some you have to pay to move
others you can move w/discount
others are market
others command a premium
The 3 that I mentioned are not stars, but they are not scraps or drek either.