What I take umbrage with is this same-old same-old "you said this proposal was bad for your team, that somehow means that you think it's good for our team (despite your never saying anything of the sort and in fact explicitly noting that you don't think that way), OMG HOW DARE YOU IMPOSE THIS ON US YOU'RE SO EVIL AND UNREASONABLE".
But you
are being unreasonable. Just take a breath and listen for one single moment.
Let's pretend Dave Poile called up Ken Holland said he would trade Roman Josi for Darnell Nurse. What do you think Holland's reaction would be? An instantaneous yes. He'd set landspeed records driving Nurse to the airport and laugh like a supervillain all the way there and back.
But what if Poile then said wait- such a trade depended on the inclusion of Kailer Yamamoto (and Adam Larsson for salary purposes)?
Let's look at the facts:
-The Oilers are weak on the wing and tight against the cap.
-Yamamoto is producing at an unusually high clip given his age and draft position. It's probably not sustainable but hey Edmonton eneds the depth scoring so they'll take it.
-The Oilers don't have another Yamamoto further down the lineup, and wouldn't immediately have a player available who could fill the hole trading him creates.
Would the Oilers still do that trade? f***ING YES.
You see, some trades are so good, and improve your team so much, that it doesn't matter what immediate holes they create. You will not find another Roman Josi anywhere, and no one else would be sane enough to trade you one for so comparatively little. That player will have a greater impact on the game by virtue of his usage and position than Yamamoto will, even if it means Holland has to then go out and find another second line winger. He can get one for less than the immense difference in value between Nurse + Yamamoto and Josi.
A Texier + PLD for Draisaitl proposal is the same thing. It doesn't matter if you don't have another Texier right now in your system or on your team, because middle six centers are so much easier to find than Hart/Art Ross/etc. winners. That isn't up for debate, no matter how attached emotionally to the player you might be.
However, what you're proposing is that Holland not only hang up on Poile, but block him on FB/IG/Twitter and take out a restraining order. So no, you're not being reasonable. End of story.
It's the same thing every single g-ddamn time with some of these people, going all the way back to when they decided for us that Ales Hemsky for Ryan Johansen was fair and got offended when we dared suggest otherwise. It's going out of one's way to claim victimization, and the only difference between whether or not that's just boneheadedness or outright trolling is basically whether or not they're actually aware of the contradiction.
I would suggest that someone who is mad about a trade proposal I think I read on an Oilers fan/blog site like ten years ago is the one partaking in victimhood, but that's just me. Do you have any more recent examples of Oiler fans being "offended" by your behavior, or just that one from antiquity?