Legal question

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by Kid Canada, Dec 10, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kid Canada

    Kid Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just wondering here. Just throwing it out there.

    What if the league was to accept a harder luxery tax at around 40 million, then one at 45 million which is eve harder. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the NHLPA does offer something like this sometime down the road.

    All 30 owners then get together and sign a contract stating that they wont spend more than 45 million. If they do spend more, then they get the boot, just like that NFL owner who was forced to move the team because he wouldnt build a new stadium (believe it was LA). Any new owner that comes into the NHL, before buying a team, he must sign this contract stating he wont spend more than 45 million. Basically have an owners cap.

    Now I'm assuming the NHLPA would throw 'conspiracy' all over them, if they were to find out.

    Is this a far fetched scenario, is it even possible. Or is it illegal basically. Some lawyer, please help me out.
     
  2. Lionel Hutz

    Lionel Hutz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    13,349
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    Locking the Lounge??
    The contract you are suggesting the owners sign is illegal.
     
  3. mudcrutch79

    mudcrutch79 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Home Page:
    Illegal contracts are unenforceable. It would be useless, and would open them up to massive damages in a collusion suit. Bad times.
     
  4. Kid Canada

    Kid Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what I was thinking, but was un-sure if it was illegal or not. Thanks anyways.
     
  5. Dr Love

    Dr Love Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    20,360
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Gunslinger
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    Al Davis wasn't forced to move, and did want to build a new stadium. In fact Davis scheduled games in Oakland without league approval, and the Raiders claimed the league blocked them from moving to Oakland. Davis tried to get a new stadium in LA, claims the NFL interfered, and the deal fell through, so he packed up and moved to Oakland.
     
  6. Lionel Hutz

    Lionel Hutz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    13,349
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    Locking the Lounge??
    yes, for example, if you sign a contractwith a prostitute, the courts will not say, well, prostitution is illegal, but they do have a contract....
     
  7. vanlady

    vanlady Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    810
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Almost all franchise organizations have something called a "fiscal responsibility" clause in there franchise agreements. These clauses allow the franchisor to monitor the fiscal health of all the franchisees and penalize them if they do not abide by the clause restricitions. Walmart, Canadian Tire and McDonalds are all examples of this, so are Major League Baseball and the NBA, this is one of the ways the Expos got moved to Washington. The NHL from my understanding has the same clause, this is NOT collusion. The league just needs to get the guts to use it.
     
  8. mudcrutch79

    mudcrutch79 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,903
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    The Big Smoke
    Home Page:
    Vanlady are you a lawyer? This place has been plagued lately by people without legal backgrounds making statements about legal issues with nothing to back it up. If you can back it up, back it up...if not, you're better off not tossing opinion into these things-it just makes it harder to discuss what's really going on.

    I know for a FACT that you're wrong about some "clause" being why the Expos got moved to Washington. MLB has a clause requiring teams to maintain a certain debt/equity ratio, but the Expos situation had nothing to do with that clause.
     
  9. Lionel Hutz

    Lionel Hutz Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    13,349
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Location:
    Locking the Lounge??
    They (NHL teams) are seperate business entities, when they communicate for the purpose of regulating an industry, it is collusion.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"