- Mar 26, 2007
- 3,777
- 1,838
Eller is a champion on a first place team playing multiple important roles and just signed to a home team discount.
Next.
Next.
I want my 3C to possess the puck in their end, that’s the best defense for the 3rd line, by that measure he’s very good defensively. Richards and Morrison were fair defensively but were postseason anchors on possession. I just went through the Ovechkin era and the only time the 3rd line didn’t kill us in the postseason was when it was centered by Arnott who’s another possession guy. The knock on Eller has always been he hangs on to the puck, on PP1 that’s a liability but on the 3rd line it can be an asset.
We are 3-for-17 on the PP in the 5 games before Kuznetsov and Oshie got hurt. Was that Eller's fault too?
Maaco has partially convinced me on Eller.
He's not good enough offensively to be more than a low end 2c and not good enough defensively to be an ideal 3c.
I don't think you're gonna get a better player for 3.5M AAV on the free market though, so I'm still happy to have Eller on the team. I just think if Eller is your 2c, you're probably not a good team. 3C on a good team is a good fit.
I'm fine with the possession but I'd like to see him find his teammates more often. Another thing he does that is a big no no is he will have possession behind the net and brings it back towards the blue line and turns it over. Those plays lead to odd man rushes the other way.I want my 3C to possess the puck in their end, that’s the best defense for the 3rd line, by that measure he’s very good defensively. Richards and Morrison were fair defensively but were postseason anchors on possession. I just went through the Ovechkin era and the only time the 3rd line didn’t kill us in the postseason was when it was centered by Arnott who’s another possession guy. The knock on Eller has always been he hangs on to the puck, on PP1 that’s a liability but on the 3rd line it can be an asset.
When you say more often, generally speaking you take possession and pass, shoot, or turn the puck over, and if you’re saying in 2 different ways it would be better if he didn’t turn the puck and thus would set up more teammates of course, but to say Connolly and Bura aren’t being set up enough by Eller is absurd. If you replaced him Stephenson they would see markedly fewer opportunities. And I look at it as Eller spends so much time behind the net he’s the guy you can afford to have turn the puck over because it’s the furthest distance the other way and thus least likely to lead to odd man rushes.I'm fine with the possession but I'd like to see him find his teammates more often. Another thing he does that is a big no no is he will have possession behind the net and brings it back towards the blue line and turns it over. Those plays lead to odd man rushes the other way.
Lol I think you have a man crush on Eller
I think Stephenson needs some regular linemates. And I think he should be playing center.i like Boyd getting better and better with every game. 18-72-25 have all the chances to become the best 4th line in the NHL at the end of the season.
is he better than 72 on the dot? The guy definitely has got some good wheels. Him and Vrana are the fastest skaters on the team, so his best place is on the wing, imo.I think Stephenson needs some regular linemates. And I think he should be playing center.
He doesnt turn the puck over behind the net. He turns it over on the half wall or the blue line. At times we have the puck down low and he carries it out high.When you say more often, generally speaking you take possession and pass, shoot, or turn the puck over, and if you’re saying in 2 different ways it would be better if he didn’t turn the puck and thus would set up more teammates of course, but to say Connolly and Bura aren’t being set up enough by Eller is absurd. If you replaced him Stephenson they would see markedly fewer opportunities. And I look at it as Eller spends so much time behind the net he’s the guy you can afford to have turn the puck over because it’s the furthest distance the other way and thus least likely to lead to odd man rushes.
I guess you dont watch the games. Stephenson is probably our best faceoff man.is he better than 72 on the dot?
hmm. actually i haven't seen him on the dot very often since he's a winger. Or just haven't paid attention to him on the dotI guess you dont watch the games. Stephenson is probably our best faceoff man.
He only takes about one per game this season and last so it's easy to miss.I guess you dont watch the games. Stephenson is probably our best faceoff man.
I think we are trying to create offense from our pk. Which is why we have seen Kuzy and even Burakovsky on the pk. Another thing I noticed is guys leaving the zone early even while in the pk. I'd rather have our best defensive players on the pk. We havent scored on the pk anyway.He only takes about one per game this season and last so it's easy to miss.
Boyd isn't that good defensively and I'm still pretty shocked they've put him on the PK. They must like him but it's pretty aggressive. I like his offensive vision/creativity but not sure he'll really be up to it physically come playoff time. That said, he's at least made strides with his skating so that he can assert himself offensively. It's just some of the other areas get exposed defensively.
Its nice that he scored that goal but it is a risky play. What would have you said if he unnecessarily iced the puck and the Rangers tied the game off the faceoff in our zone?I loved seeing Willy ice the game with an ENG yes - risking an icing and up by just 1. I used to argue with someone here that the pansy flip to center (that often doesn't even clear the zone) isn't universally the best play. So I am thrilled to see Todd agrees that the reward outweighs the risk.
Bonus being it Willy, of course. No Skill Will Kills Shrills.
Rags were 7-2-1 in their last 10, we just handled them in their house. Caps starting to gel.
Burakovsky is at eight seconds per game on the PK now. That idea fizzled. They've ramped back that aggressiveness considerably.I think we are trying to create offense from our pk. Which is why we have seen Kuzy and even Burakovsky on the pk. Another thing I noticed is guys leaving the zone early even while in the pk. I'd rather have our best defensive players on the pk. We havent scored on the pk anyway.
Burakovsky is at eight seconds per game on the PK now. That idea fizzled. They've ramped back that aggressiveness considerably.
I do like the idea of Stephenson at center compared to Boyd, esp. since it's not like 18 is thriving on the wing at the moment.
Eller was what, 4th in playoff ES points? More than Backstrom, Oshie, etc. Not bad for a 3.5M 3C!