Series Talk: Leafs vs Jackets- Series Preview and Discussion - II

Status
Not open for further replies.

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
26,557
32,810
I know this isn’t completely finalized, and it’s still some time away, but what else are we going to talk about related to hockey? Some other team board’s already started this thread so may as well. I will go over every team of how they stack up with one another, including each line. For the Leafs, I will be looking at the stats from when Keefe was hired for more relevance and accuracy.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Overall Record: 36-25-9 (tied for 12th in PTS%)
After Coaching Change: 27-15-5 (8th in PTS%)
Columbus Blue Jackets
Overall Record: 33-22-15 (tied for 12th PTS%}

Offense

5 on 5


5 on 5

Maple Leafs

Blue Jackets

GF/60

2.83(4th)

2.16(26th)

CF/60

58.74(7th)

54.1(23rd)

SCF/60

30.63(2nd)

24.72(25th)

HCF/60

12.08(6th)

9.06(29th)

xGF/60

2.59(2nd)

2.2(tied for 16th)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Not surprises here, Leafs are the superior offensive team by a mile. They score a lot more and generate a lot more. The Jackets that are not known for their offense, is showed well here. The Leafs have the better offensive players but we already knew that, and might not be the aspect that decided the series.

Power Play


PP

Maple Leafs

Blue Jackets

PP%

26.4(2nd)

16.4%(24th)

CF/60

93.23(19th)

83.96(29th)

SCF/60

52.67(10th)

39.5(29th)

HCF/60

17.8(23rd)

14.51(30th)

xGF/60

6.52(17th)

5.63(27th)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Leafs have the better numbers on the PP as you should expect, but they are average at best for a team with offensive stars. Don’t let the ranking fool you, it is a result of a high shooting % In fact, if not for a recent climb, The Leafs numbers were where the Jackets numbers were which are awful in every metric. Jackets have even worse luck offensively on the PP by league rank, and would be helpful if they can improve it a bit. Getting back their injured players will help. I’m interested at what Sheldon Keefe does on the PP. Does he put Rielly on the 1st unit in place of Barrie? If Sandin plays, does he stay on the 2nd PP? It’s unlikely he removes any of the big 4 from the 1st unit, but what does the 2nd unit look like? If Keefe plays Robertson, does he play on that unit? There are lots of questions, but simply put, the PP numbers need to be better than they are. Leafs get the advantage, but it’s not an amazing PP.

Defence

5 on 5


5 on 5 Numbers

Maple Leafs

Blue Jackets

GA/60

2.68(20th)

2.11(5th)

CA/60

55.68(15th)

56.06(17th)

SCA/60

27.5(18th)

24.89(10th)

HDCA/60

11.14(17th)

8.82(2nd)

xGA/60

2.33(tied for 15th)

2.04(3rd)

SV%:

91.29(23rd)

92.81(5th)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
I am going to say this again. Leafs aren’t as bad defensively as they are made out to be, and the numbers support this. They are however average at best, and the will face a team who plays solid defence, and takes away the prime scoring chances well. The question is will they be able to slow down a team like the Leafs, who generates offense at a great level. Can the Leafs defence hold against a poor offense, but one that will be mostly healthy? The Jackets also got much better goaltending then the Leafs.
Columbus gets the advantage here by a decent amount

Penalty Killing


PK Numbers

Maple Leafs

Blue Jackets

PK%

80.9(12th)

81.7%(10th)

CA/60

89.25(10th)

84.13(5th)

SCA/60

44.17(6th)

43.06(4th)

HDCA/60

15.63(3rd)

13.82(1st)

xGA/60

5.5(3rd)

5.31(1st)

SV%

85.81(18th)

86.75(13th)
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
These are 2 excellent PK teams. They don’t give up many shots or chances. Maple Leafs under Keefe have been a really good PK team, and this may surprise some people. The Jackets are truly elite though, and building off their defence at 5 on 5, they don’t give up much. The question for the Jackets will be can they continue it against a team with offensive stars, even though the Leafs PP numbers aren’t exactly convincing. The question is will Andersen perform, because he is the only reason the Leafs PK% is down.
I will give the Blue Jackets the edge here, but only slightly.
Overall just by looking at the stats, this is a good matchup where whatever one team is good at, and bad at, the other team is the opposite. Leafs are a great offensive team and can score with anyone, but their going to face a solid defensive team. On the other hand, Jackerts can’t do much on offense which might be helped with getting healthy, and the Leafs aren’t bad defensively. The special teams battle should be interesting. Leafs have the more dangerous personnel on the PP by a wide margin, but their underlying numbers aren’t great despite the high SH%, where the Jackets have an elite PK. The Jackets have an atrocious PP going against a good PK as well. The key for Toronto is if the PP catches fire. If it does, I think the Jackets might be in trouble. For Columbus, If they can get some production on the PP, and keep up their structural play and limit chances, that could put the series in their favour. Columbus will get their chances against an inconsistent defensive team, and if they start scoring, Leafs will be in tough.

Line Matchups (Potentially)
Forwards


Line 1

Hyman-Matthews-Marner

Nyquist-PLD-Atkinson

TOI

374.02

103.04

CF%

52.31%

50.48%

SCI%

55.77%

48.08%

HDCI%

55.36%

46.88%

XGF%

56.71%

50.60%

OSZ%

56.50%

62.50%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
I think Keefe will put Matthews with Marner to start, but could change things up if he doesn’t like what he sees. This trio has been a solid line since Keefe first put them together, despite Marner really struggling at times this season. They have been a solid possession line, and controlled the play when on the ice. Hyman at times is what makes the line continue to tick even when the other 2 are off. There is some defensive issues usually from lacklustre plays from Marner, but he can turn his season around with a good playoffs. Keefe might go back with Nylander-Matthews as he did in the last game before the stoppage, but we haven’t been seen them consistently with another winger. The player that played with them the most is Johnsson who won’t be available, and followed by Kapanen who looked lost beside them, but Kapanen really transformed himself so maybe he works this time.
For Columbus, the forward lines are mere guesses at this point according to their board, but we might see this line to begin though. They have been okay as a line by the numbers, but at best break even with their competition. They also haven’t played enough minutes together to form a good conclusion though. One logical switch that should made is Bjorkstrand for Atkinson. The line’s TOI is about the same, but with Bjorkstrand, Nyquist-PLD have dominated with their xGF% at near 65%, and the zone starts are almost identical.


Line 2

Nylander-Tavares-Mikhavev

Texier-Wennberg-Bjorkstrand

TOI

10:42

32:27

CF%

69.57%

60.38%

SCF%

69.23%

57.89%

HDCF%

66.67%

80.00%

xGF%

56.25%

60.92%

OSZ%

71.43%

60.00%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
The winger beside these two is just a guess, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Keefe put Mikhavev in a top 6 role, and this line is the only option if the top line stays together. Keefe really loves Mikhavev, so he might put him in the fire even coming off a serious injury. The numbers don’t mean anything with only 11 minutes on the ice together. If not Mikhavev, Keefe also put Kerfoot on the ice, and they played nearly 200 minutes with each other. This was one of the few criticisms people had of Keefe, where he continusly played Kerfoot on the line, despite him being better at centre. The line however was terrific by the numbers, and created a lot but also gave up a lot of goals mostly due to goaltending. It’s not my favourite line but Keefe might go with it again at some point.
This one I have no real idea on what this line will look, especially if Bjorkstrand is put on the top line


Line 3

Engvall-Kerfoot-Kapanen

Foligno-Jenner-Anderson

TOI

76:00

63.48

CF%

61.07%

45.53%

SCF%

59.49%

43.14%

HCDF%

58.82%

42.86%

xGF%

58.37%

44.80%

OSZ%

48.15%

42.31%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
This line was amazing when they played, so people didn’t like when they kept getting broken up. They might have won 2 games on their own. The TOI isn’t overly big, but it’s enough to tell us they dominated, even with their zone starts not being overly favourable. This line should be kept if the season resumed, and even experiment with It more if there are warm up games before the play in round.
The big question for the Jackets is will Anderson play. His timeline is apparently mid july, so he probably will I have to guess, but if not, you might see the young Bemstorm play on the 3rd line.


Line 4

Clifford-Gauthier-Spezza

Robinson-Shore-Nash

TOI

26:31

3:37

CF%

40.43%

57.14%

SCF%

35.71%

33.33%

HCDF%

37.50%

0%

xGF%

41.90%

33.18%

OSZ%

25.00%

100%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
This line is awful. They weren’t good at all, and clearly put the team in a disadvantage, but it’s only 26 minutes, so maybe this changes. One of the issues with the Leafs was depth scoring, and this line won’t help, so Keefe needs to figure this out. Malgin might get in a game here as well.
I’m not sure what the 4th line will look like, but it might include 2 of these 3. The Jackets have multiple players who can play different positions, so that complicates guessing the lines.

Depth Options for Toronto

Malgin
Korshkov
Brooks
Aberg
Petan
Depth Options for Columbus
Bemstorm
Gerbe
Stenlund
Matteau
Lilja

Defense


Defensive Pair 1

Rielly-Ceci

Werenski-Jones

TOI

145:31

763.36

CF%

46.74%

50.25%

SCF%

46.72%

48.51%

HDCF%

44.44%

49.12%

xGF%

48.72%

51.08%

OSZ%

46.15%

57.89%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
I don’t like it, but I think we see the Rielly-Ceci pair again at least to start. I’m not sure Keefe has much of a choice, so hard to blame him. However, the results are in the numbers and the eye test. Rielly can’t defend his blueline, and Ceci just makes strange decisions with and without the puck. I guess you could shelter them more, but the starts aren’t bad right now, and you need to play one of your best defensemen. The decision on who to put Rielly with should be interesting. I don’t see Keefe scratching Ceci with him being used like a top 4 defenseman, while he was here. Keefe could go all offense with Rielly-Barrie again, but even against a poor offensive team, that’s still not a good idea for long stretches.
This is the key for the Jackets and mainly Jones. If he plays as well as he is capable, this could seriously have a big swing in the series. Werenski provides great support to him offensively, but the stabilizer and leader is Jones. The numbers aren’t great analytically, and the pair played sheltered offensive minutes, but this is still the best pair for the Jackets.


Defensive Pair 2

Muzzin-Holl

Gavrikov-Savard

TOI

456.18

751.37

CF%

53.01%

47.53%

SCF%

54.27%

50%

HDCF%

55.56%

48.68%

xGF%

56.56%

50.67%

OSZ%

39.69%

40.84%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
The Leafs best D pair, and it’s not even close to being a debate. They excelled in a shutdown role, and were amazing even with tough zone starts. They have great chemistry with one another, and you could ride them in a game. Muzzin is the engine of this defence, and is the glue that prevents it from falling apart. Holl has had a solid season as he has got more duty under Keefe. He struggled a little bit down the stretch, but having Muzzin by his side should help him again. If the Leafs are going to do something defensively and be better than average, it might come down to these two.
Another set in stone pairing. Just like their counterpart, this is the defensive shutdown pairing for the Jackets. While their numbers are well below from the Muzzin-Holl pairing, Torts has decided to lean on them defensively, and they are close to break even as a pairing.


Defensive Pair 3

Dermott-Barrie

Murray-Nutivaara

TOI

259.19

78.52

CF%

50.51%

48.39%

SCF%

50.21%

46.58%

HDCF%

52.08%

50%

xGF%

50.53%

53.06%

OSZ%

61.70%

58.70%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
All that’s left is Dermott and Barrie. They played a lot together, and broke even as a pair under heavily sheltered zone starts. We just don’t want them stuck in the defensive zone on a shift. Barrie has produced and struggled defensively which is not a surprise. Dermott was uneven, but he was really solid as the defacto #1 defenseman down the stretch with the injuries. Dermott might get a chance higher in the line up maybe even beside Rielly, but I still have my doubts if Keefe wants to do that.
Sandin could play a factor here, but he will only come in for Ceci, and I’m not sure if Keefe scratches Ceci. Liljegren is also available along with Rosen if need be. Keefe may go with the 7 defensemen route which he did a little bit during the injuries.
This is likely the pairing with Murray a lock, but could see Kukan in for Nutivvara. Their zone starts are shseltered, but not as much as the 3rd pairing for the Leafs. The Jackets pairing is also overall better by a slight margin.
Depth Options for Toronto
Sandin
Liljegren
Rosen
Depth Options for Columbus
Kukan
Peeke
Harrington

Goalies

Starter

Andersen

Merzlikins

GP
ESSV%
HDSV%

52
.918%
.812%

32
.926%
.834%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
There is no question Andersen is starting. However he wasn’t very good this season. He only had one good month which was in November, and cost the team a few games this season under both coaches.
It’s still a question who starts but higher chance its Merzlikins. Just by looking at the numbers, it’s the right choice


Backup

Campbell

Korpisalo

GP
ESSV%
HDSV%

6
.920%
.844%

37
.919%
.818%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Campbell impressed in the games he played with the Leafs, and if Andersen falters, Keefe may have to make the difficult choice and go with Campbell.
There is still a good chance Korpisalo starts, so hard to say anything definitive right now.

Someone please fix any formatting issues
 

Zybalto

Registered User
Dec 28, 2012
9,490
8,767
Andersen is the key. I can only hope this outlier season is mirrored by an outlier playoffs in that he actually outplays the other keeper in a series.

(Warning fancystats)
Expected Goals Against/60 team rankings:

Leafs under Babs 2017-2020: 25th
Leafs under Keefe: 10th

Either Keefe has found a way to break analytics or the team has gotten a lot better defensively.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,912
11,862
Leafs Home Board
So if what happened 1 year ago shouldn't matter why do others keep brining up how Columbus swept Tampa Bay last year, because that has nothing to do with this year. Plus the fact they no longer have Matt Duchene, Artemi Panarin, and Sergei Bobrovsky.

Since teams have been told months in advance and know their play-in opponent already we find ourselves in unique territory here.. How do you suppose some coach would go about best preparing their team for what has been confirmed is their opponent?

Toronto would review the CBJ/TB series & the CBJ/Boston series results to prescout the Blue Jackets, their systems, strategies, players , what worked and what didn't etc, while no doubt CBJ would review the Leafs/Boston series from last year to get a preview how their opposition performed and what they did in that series when working on their game plans for this series. You even have a direct overlapping opportunity here to compare both Toronto and CBJ verses Boston.

Columbus like Boston is also a top defensive team with a low goals against and driven by strong goaltending, so comparing how the Leafs players performed would be grounds for game planning, while Toronto much like TB is a high scoring talented offensive team so a coach would also combine what worked last year and incorporate that also into its plan.

That is essentially how coaching works, and since Sheldon Keefe is new and has no past NHL playoff like experience to draw upon, he would rely heavily on what his opponents did this season as well as last year playoff conditions, and also study his own team and their performance against Boston in round #1 and taking from that things that worked successfully and design things for his own game plan in preparation accordingly.

Keefe will incorporate both Mike Babcock's techniques, line combos, that worked successfully last year and then build upon that with his own ideas and strategies to come up with a successful plan on how to both attack and defend against Columbus.
 
Last edited:

LeafChief

Matthew Knies Enthusiast
Mar 5, 2013
14,555
22,601
Scarborough
Since teams have been told months in advance and know their play-in opponent already we find ourselves in unique territory here.. How do you suppose some coach would go about best preparing their team for what has been confirmed is their opponent?

Toronto would review the CBJ/TB series to prescout the Blue Jackets, their systems, strategies, players , what worked and what didn't etc, while no doubt CBJ would review the Leafs/Boston series from last year to get a preview how their opposition performed and what they did in that series when working on their game plans for this series.

Columbus like Boston is also a top defensive team with a low goals against and driven by strong goaltending, so comparing how the Leafs players performed would be grounds for game planning, while Toronto much like TB is a high scoring talented offensive team so a coach would also combine what worked last year and incorporate that also into its plan.

That is essentially how coaching works, and since Sheldon Keefe is new and has no past NHL playoff like experience to draw upon, he would rely heavily on what his opponents did this season as well as last year playoff conditions, and also study his own team and their performance against Boston in round #1 and taking from that things that worked successfully and design things for his own game plan in preparation accordingly.

Keefe will incorporate both Mike Babcock's techniques, line combos, that worked successfully last year and then build upon that with his own ideas and strategies to come up with a successful plan on how to both attack and defend against Columbus.
Why do you speak in absolutes? What gave you the impression that your opinion is fact?
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,241
10,794
Lot of work put into table, I might have used Columbus stats from Keefe being hired as well, so everything is the same.
 
Last edited:

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
So when is this series supposed to start? And will the games be played in empty stadiums?
There might be enough changes with a positive effect to allowing fans in later. I would guess the league is spreading it out with the hope less restrictions might allow fans by August when playin start. We might see fans allowed back to sporting event and large gatherings back to normal levels. They might open up full tilt if the numbers continue to fall or possibly to epidemic levels soon. Compromised people won’t choose to go out in to large crowds but completely healthy people will and already are showing little lessened or no fear of this virus right now.
It might be a sense of false security being communicated by media but people want it over and are accepting it.

I wouldn’t be surprised if fans are back in local arenas in August. Just following the fluidity of the course of actions of feds and provincial decision being phased in. If spikes start occurring in the virus at any time from all over it could be shut down as fast as it reopened
 
Last edited:

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
26,557
32,810
Lot of work put into table, I might have used Columbus stats from Keefe being hired as well, so everything is the same.
Why would we do that? Columbus didn't change their coach mid season, so the system has been the same since the start. If they made a change, then I would have used their after coaching change stats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kb and IPS

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,241
10,794
There might be enough changes with a positive effect to allowing fans in later. I would guess the league is spreading it out with the hope less restrictions might allow fans by August when playin start. We might see fans allowed back to sporting event and large gatherings back to normal levels. They might open up full tilt if the numbers continue to fall or possibly to epidemic levels soon. Compromised people won’t choose to go out in to large crowds but completely healthy people will and already are showing little lessened or no fear of this virus right now.
It might be a sense of false security being communicated by media but people want it over and are accepting it.

I wouldn’t be surprised if fans are back in local arenas in August. Just following the fluidity of the course of actions of feds and provincial decision being phased in. If spikes start occurring in the virus at any time from all over it could be shut down as fast as it reopened
Can’t see it, since all teams are being placed in an isolated hub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wafflewhipper

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,241
10,794
Why would we do that? Columbus didn't change their coach mid season, so the system has been the same since the start. If they made a change, then I would have used their after coaching change stats.

So both teams have played roughly the same number of games, Remove any October/November bias that may favour one team over the other. Stats are more meaningful with similar factors.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Since teams have been told months in advance and know their play-in opponent already we find ourselves in unique territory here.. How do you suppose some coach would go about best preparing their team for what has been confirmed is their opponent?

Toronto would review the CBJ/TB series & the CBJ/Boston series results to prescout the Blue Jackets, their systems, strategies, players , what worked and what didn't etc, while no doubt CBJ would review the Leafs/Boston series from last year to get a preview how their opposition performed and what they did in that series when working on their game plans for this series. You even have a direct overlapping opportunity here to compare both Toronto and CBJ verses Boston.

Columbus like Boston is also a top defensive team with a low goals against and driven by strong goaltending, so comparing how the Leafs players performed would be grounds for game planning, while Toronto much like TB is a high scoring talented offensive team so a coach would also combine what worked last year and incorporate that also into its plan.

That is essentially how coaching works, and since Sheldon Keefe is new and has no past NHL playoff like experience to draw upon, he would rely heavily on what his opponents did this season as well as last year playoff conditions, and also study his own team and their performance against Boston in round #1 and taking from that things that worked successfully and design things for his own game plan in preparation accordingly.

Keefe will incorporate both Mike Babcock's techniques, line combos, that worked successfully last year and then build upon that with his own ideas and strategies to come up with a successful plan on how to both attack and defend against Columbus.
Mike babcock hasn’t patented any style of play far as i know. Keefe will design a plan and base it off of a career that won everywhere he has ever coached. He is a Ahl championship winning coach. Thus he has a champion pedigree already. Plenty of playoff expierence with the AHL is very valuable to him.

This is keefe’s team and I don’t think babcock has any bearing on the team other than than the fact he almost killed our chance to even make the playoffs before 30 games had he not been removed and replaced with a players coach.

This team would not even be in the playoffs had Babcock been kept on as coach. The damage was done early by Babcock and players didn’t like him.
Keefe doesn’t get enough credit for turning this around to a playoff team pre covid and by points percentage at the pause we were in the playoffs regardless.

Columbus is going to get swept. :)
 

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,056
7,321
So when is this series supposed to start? And will the games be played in empty stadiums?
I hope it is not here but I fear it will be.
Best guess western conference in Vegas (or maybe Edmonton if TO is a no go).
Eastern conference here in TO (or maybe Columbus if PM says no).
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,092
38,154
So both teams have played roughly the same number of games, Remove any October/November bias that may favour one team over the other. Stats are more meaningful with similar factors.
Stats are only meaningful when it makes your favourite team look better.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Why would we do that? Columbus didn't change their coach mid season, so the system has been the same since the start. If they made a change, then I would have used their after coaching change stats.

actually, it's interesting to look at......

Up until Babcock was fired:

TOR: #13 gls for, #24 gls agnst, #23 gls diff, #23sv% = #25 record
CBJ: #28 gls for, #21 gls agnst, #28 gls diff, #24sv% = #23 record

Since Keefe was hired:

TOR: #1 gls for, #17 gls agnst, #6 gls diff, #20sv% = #8 record
CBJ: #26 gls for, #1 gls agnst, #10 gls diff, #1sv% = #10 record


So the Torts-coached blue jackets, when they got bad goaltending like the leafs, were just as bad "defensively" as the leafs. Then suddenly their goaltending got red hot, and with that best goaltending in the league since Keefe was hired, they now are the best "defensive" team in the league as well. That's all with the same coach, same players. No improvement in offense of course.

The Leafs, otoh, managed to significantly improve their defense DESPITE not getting any improvement in goaltending, since that coaching change. Their improvement in goals against seems to clearly be an improvement defensively. And they also happened to dramatically improve their offense, as well.

But remember - when the Jackets' goaltending stunk early on, so did their "defense".
 

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
26,557
32,810
So both teams have played roughly the same number of games, Remove any October/November bias that may favour one team over the other. Stats are more meaningful with similar factors.
This seems like a flawed way to look at things. Leafs have had a different system since the coaching change. Why would we also take into account the stats from a different system?
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,912
11,862
Leafs Home Board
So both teams have played roughly the same number of games, Remove any October/November bias that may favour one team over the other. Stats are more meaningful with similar factors.

Goaltending stats - from 2020 onward - until end of season.

Freddy Andersen last 23 game starts .. 11-9-3 record with a .902 save percentage, 2.56 GAA with 1 shutout.
vs
Elvis Merzlikins last 23 game starts .. 13-5-4 record with a .935 save percentage, 1.97 GAA with 5 shutouts.
 

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
Since teams have been told months in advance and know their play-in opponent already we find ourselves in unique territory here.. How do you suppose some coach would go about best preparing their team for what has been confirmed is their opponent?

Toronto would review the CBJ/TB series & the CBJ/Boston series results to prescout the Blue Jackets, their systems, strategies, players , what worked and what didn't etc, while no doubt CBJ would review the Leafs/Boston series from last year to get a preview how their opposition performed and what they did in that series when working on their game plans for this series. You even have a direct overlapping opportunity here to compare both Toronto and CBJ verses Boston.

Columbus like Boston is also a top defensive team with a low goals against and driven by strong goaltending, so comparing how the Leafs players performed would be grounds for game planning, while Toronto much like TB is a high scoring talented offensive team so a coach would also combine what worked last year and incorporate that also into its plan.

That is essentially how coaching works, and since Sheldon Keefe is new and has no past NHL playoff like experience to draw upon, he would rely heavily on what his opponents did this season as well as last year playoff conditions, and also study his own team and their performance against Boston in round #1 and taking from that things that worked successfully and design things for his own game plan in preparation accordingly.

Keefe will incorporate both Mike Babcock's techniques, line combos, that worked successfully last year and then build upon that with his own ideas and strategies to come up with a successful plan on how to both attack and defend against Columbus.
It's one thing to review the Blue Jackets/Lightning series from last year, however you need to realize this when doing that. In those four games their top point producers were Matt Duchene with 3 goals, 4 assists and 7 points, along with Artemi Panarin who had 2 goals, 3 assists for 5 points. They were a major reason why they won that series and this year both are playing for the Rangers and Predators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hock98 and kb

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Goaltending stats - from 2020 onward - until end of season.

Freddy Andersen last 23 games is 11-9-3 record with a .902 save percentage, 2.56 GAA with 1 shutout.
vs
Elvis Merzlikins last 23 games 13-5-4 record with a .935 save percentage, 1.97 GAA with 5 shutouts.

yup. CBJ has received much better goaltending than the leafs.

so that better change.

promisingly, Freddy ended the year on a 5-1-1 run thanks to .931sv%, and seemed on his way back to salvaging the year and ending up near his typical .917-.918 level.

Merzlikins on the other hand ended the year on a 1-3-4 run thanks to .900 goaltending, and has no track record to speak of. His rookie year has been a strange one:

1. 10gms: 0-4-4, .889
2. 14gms: 12-2-0, .953
3. 9gms: 1-3-4, .900

Do we look at his average? or did he just get one of those fluke rookie streaks before the league started to figure it out?

we'll see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->