If Sparks got moved for McBackup and became a starter someone you'd have a much different tone. Hindsight is 20/20 and you're speaking from a position where it's over and done with. Someone would be getting nailed to the cross if Sparks became anything legit and we kept an old man who's a career back-up. Would he have been the better option last year? Yes. But what did we gamble really? A guy we had grabbed off waivers the year before? Backups of that caliber come around all the time. We weren't wrong to gamble on potential. 7 years? He's not a forward, he's a goalie. How many goalies crack the NHL earlier than 25? I don't even like Sparks, it's just not hard to see why Dubas bet on Sparks instead of McElhinney. Whatever backlash he's gotten would've be a million times worse had Sparks became anything significant elsewhere without getting a chance to fail here first