If Dubas had a brain he would wait until McDavid is dominating statistically and then use his 12.5 AAV as the bench mark. 13 is too much for Matthews TBH, he should be closer to Eichel than McDavid in terms of $$$.
If Dubas had a brain he would wait until McDavid is dominating statistically and then use his 12.5 AAV as the bench mark. 13 is too much for Matthews TBH, he should be closer to Eichel than McDavid in terms of $$$.
That's not really how it works though.If Dubas had a brain he would wait until McDavid is dominating statistically and then use his 12.5 AAV as the bench mark. 13 is too much for Matthews TBH, he should be closer to Eichel than McDavid in terms of $$$.
Right now Matthews is playing at a level where 8*12 start to look like a reasonable request from Matthews part.
What confuses me in the report is, if the Leafs are looking at Crosby/Stamkos/Toews/Kane-esque five year deal, where the numbers would set? It is difficult to see Matthews accepting less than nine even on shorter term so would three million cap space over the next five years be worth the trouble?
Right now Matthews is playing at a level where 8*12 start to look like a reasonable request from Matthews part.
What confuses me in the report is, if the Leafs are looking at Crosby/Stamkos/Toews/Kane-esque five year deal, where the numbers would set? It is difficult to see Matthews accepting less than nine even on shorter term so would three million cap space over the next five years be worth the trouble?
I think that Elliotte thinks that he thinks that Matthews and the Leafs are thinking of a number that they think could make Matthews think of signing a shorter extension. I think.
Right now is the worst time to start negotiations, matthews agent would at a minimum start at 13*8, or 11*5. Neither are optimal.
If Dubas had a brain he would wait until McDavid is dominating statistically and then use his 12.5 AAV as the bench mark. 13 is too much for Matthews TBH, he should be closer to Eichel than McDavid in terms of $$$.
I think the Leafs are realizing they made a mistake not signing his extension first last summer.
Now the price starts there no matter what unless his scoring cools way off.
8 x 13 sounds about right. Even though its crazy to think that Matthews will most likely be paid more than McDavid.
Probably could have gotten it done with a 10*8 in the summer. The avs have a similar issue with rantanen, might have easily been a 7*7, but now he could ask for 10 and not be laughed ar
5 years, 13m per
Wtf is going on with this 5 year talk. At first I took it as a joke but really du(m)bas you’re going to go for 5? Of all years 5?
6 to end at the same time as Tavares ?
4 to be a RFA?
7-8 for security ?
Make him a UFA as early as possible ?
Have him locked during his prime not have to negotiate a UFA big money deal where the backhalf will be his out of prime years
I think they could've got 11.5x8 in the summer. His agent would want more than Tavares given that Matthews outproduced Tavares in his first 2 years.
They probably could've gotten that. The ask now for 8 will likely be 13 especially if the cap rises again.
And yeah honestly McDavid is probably worth 15 per.