Bobby Orr's skating was never as good as McDavid's or Bure's so I don't know why that should be the single factor in determining if a player is "x" and not "x".Yeah, because for him to look like Orr he would have to be a McDavid level skater which he isn't, which is why its a very far reaching comparison. Orr was the best skater in the league. When someone lacks a player's iconic trait, I don't see how they are comparable.
There seems to be a desire to compare prospects to all-time greats here under the guise of stylistically, even when the players lack obvious traits which make the comparison very far reaching. There are a bunch of young defencemen who are more explosive skaters than Dahlin. He's still the best young defensive prospect in the world by a wide margin, but he isn't explosive like some such as Makar. He's elusive due to edge work and puck control. His game is unique, but not Bobby Orr like. And that's before even getting into how fundamentally different the game is from the mid-60's.
Like most very high-end talents, he plays like himself and in a unique style. Crosby and McDavid don't really play like anyone else before them. McDavid has Bure like traits with a more play making approach. Crosby plays a combination of skill, grit and lowerbody puck protection that I can't place on anyone else.
Personally I see a lot of Bobby Orr in Dahlin's game, that doesn't mean he will come close to achieving the same accomplishments or even talent, but style it's close. I see a lot of swag, a lot of desire, and a lot of wanting to make a difference between the two players. Much more to Orr's game than OEL where I don't really see any resemblance at all. Nor Karlsson for that matter. A lot of those players who are more explosive than Dahlin, don't have Orr's frame or spunk that Dahlin does. I suggest it's quite reasonable to compare the two because I see a lot of similarities myself.