alko
Registered User
It seems, that without Star(s) you cant win Stanley Cup. When was the last time, that there was a winner without NHL Star. The Real Team.
CARolina?
Then none.Eric Staal and his 100 points season. + 28 points in playffs. = Star
The 96 Panthers may very well have been the worst team to ever win a cup of they somehow beat the Avs in 96.
93 Habs ( If you exclude Roy)?
Does Vegas have any real stars?
Does MAF qualify?
Damphousse, Muller, Bellows, Desjardins, Schneider, and John Leclair starting to emerge. The weakest link of that team was the coach.The 96 Panthers may very well have been the worst team to ever win a cup of they somehow beat the Avs in 96.
93 Habs ( If you exclude Roy)?
Not sure if serious.2011 Bruins?
How many teams would you say don't have a star player in the NHL currently or through history?
In an event that a team wins the Cup some of their players are bound to at least perform at a star level if you include names like William Karlsson or Eric Staal in the category.
2011 Bruins?
The 96 Panthers may very well have been the worst team to ever win a cup of they somehow beat the Avs in 96.
93 Habs ( If you exclude Roy)?
It seems, that without Star(s) you cant win Stanley Cup. When was the last time, that there was a winner without NHL Star. The Real Team.
i think we can agree that the 1982 canucks were the most starless team to ever make the finals. at least the panthers and golden knights had goalies you might have heard of. unless you count ivan hlinka, or i guess tiger williams, there were no name players at all on the '82 canucks.
William Karlsson does. 43 goals with +49 is star level.