i have a bunch of why couldn't that old defenceman hang on for just one or two more years from this time.
what if salming had hung on for two more years and gotten to play with rookie lidstrom? what if mark howe had made it to the '97 stanley cup team?
with robinson, i honestly can't say i noticed him too much out there. i saw the canucks play the kings in a playoff series but he wasn't a major offensive force and i was too young to appreciate what he probably brought on the defensive side.
what i do remember is they would not shut up about how rob blake was a junior him, and robinson got so much credit for blake. so as a kid i always sort of imagined as robinson as a rich man's young blake, which of course i now know he was so much better than in his heyday.
i also remember thinking of him as just one of those LA ringers. they also had john tonelli and steve kasper that year. then in '92 when robinson was on his way out, they picked up coffey and huddy and brought mark hardy home. (sidenote: when the canucks in those years picked up randy gregg, ryan walter, tom fergus, even larionov and krutov, i never thought of them as ringers. maybe i should have?)
robinson on the '93 team is a fun what if, but realistically they'd upgraded on him with huddy, who i do remember as really steady in '92 and '93, i'd say something like what macoun was for the leafs but a little further from his prime. and then you had four 10 point defensemen on that team: mcsorley, blake, zhitnik, and sydor. unless robinson had it in him to carry sydor at ES on the third pair, there really wasn't room for him on that team anymore, even if he could have held on and kept playing.
it was sort of sad to see later carlyle or langway in the early 90s, in and out of the lineup, slotting into the bottom pair when it was useful. i can see why robinson wouldn't have wanted that, and why LA probably didn't either.