Larry44
#FireTortsNOW
- Mar 1, 2002
- 11,948
- 7,273
He is on a better team which shelter's them against his weaknesses. Whether he will sustain his play, it is hard to say, but I would not be surprised if he continued to contribute in that system.
The issue that concerns me is whether he will retire or not at the end of the season. Vinny is a fairly prideful guy (at least that is what it seemed like in Philly) who believes he can still play and contribute. At this moment he is playing and contributing and he may continue to do so over the remainder of the season. The agreement to retire, from what I gather, is simply a handshake, which is not a binding contract (note that there may be some behind the scenes agreement that I/we are not aware of, so I admit that). This begs the question "why should he retire if he thinks he can still play and contribute?" This was the gist of his issue in Philly and the reason why he did not simply retire as a Flyer. What changes that thought process for Vinny now as a King? If anything, he has validated himself, to himself that he can still play and contribute.
Lombardi made it clear that the only condition on his acquiring Vinny from the Flyers was that Vinny is retiring, because he can't take his cap hit next year. Without that agreement, he would still be a Flyer.
If Vinny comes to camp he will ruin LA's season before it starts, and likely sit in the pressbox for the duration of his contract, his reputation in tatters for violating his word. He won't do it.