ForsbergMoDo21
Registered User
Does anyone have any insight into what sort of protocol or standards are used to determine what does and does not count for a retirement-worthy injury (as far as still getting to collect your checks)? Given the mention of increased likelihood of complications from the retina thing, in addition to the unusually severe concussion, one would think he is at least in the territory of being able to make a legitimate case.
I’m only speculating, but it seems like his personality—especially his personality as compounded by the reported changes with his concussion ordeal—is one of high standards and expectations. Nigh stubbornness. I feel like I remember him talking about honoring his contract and it’s weight in the past. With all that’s happened I’m not sure you’d find a person in hockey who would criticize him if he decided to hang’em up, but I’m not sure that will happen. I’m not gonna pretend it wouldn’t be better for the Sabres if he retired, but I wouldn’t resent him for sticking it out.
I also find myself always watching him with all the chatter and groupthink about him in the back of my mind. If his caphit weren’t what it was, how critical would people still be of his play? If he isn’t a defensive liability, then shouldn’t he at least serve as a depth scorer/pp2 option (I.e., the sort of player the team could use)?
I’m only speculating, but it seems like his personality—especially his personality as compounded by the reported changes with his concussion ordeal—is one of high standards and expectations. Nigh stubbornness. I feel like I remember him talking about honoring his contract and it’s weight in the past. With all that’s happened I’m not sure you’d find a person in hockey who would criticize him if he decided to hang’em up, but I’m not sure that will happen. I’m not gonna pretend it wouldn’t be better for the Sabres if he retired, but I wouldn’t resent him for sticking it out.
I also find myself always watching him with all the chatter and groupthink about him in the back of my mind. If his caphit weren’t what it was, how critical would people still be of his play? If he isn’t a defensive liability, then shouldn’t he at least serve as a depth scorer/pp2 option (I.e., the sort of player the team could use)?
Last edited: