So please tell me again how Laine is poor defensively? His defensive numbers are some of the best for the top forwards. Why do people keep saying that Laine is poor defensively when for example Scheifele has far worse numbers? It gets tiring when something gets thrown around as fact when it’s not backed up by numbers. Just like global warming.
And why does every single thread end up in Laine bashing? I thought I’d read about Kyle Connor here. Are these the main boards?
Facts?
I just watch the game and come up with an opinion - there are no metrics that will tell you the whole story. I prefer my eyeball to +/-, goals for / against, corsi, fenwick, shots, blah, blah, blah. Not that I ignore stat's - my brains not big enough to compile every move made on the ice - I just don't live and die by them the way some do.
I'd hate to think the guys that actually make a living evaluating players, are basing it all on stats - if so, remove people from the equation, eliminate the discussion, and award the Selke.
Here's what I know - neither of these guys are defenders of any magnitude and the last thing we should be measuring either of them on is their D game.
Also, I haven't seen any Laine bashing here today - what are you referring to?