Kucherov now vs Peak Kane

Discussion in 'Polls - (hockey-related only)' started by illpucks, Jan 15, 2019.

?

better player

  1. kucherov now

    42.1%
  2. peak patrick kane

    50.4%
  3. too close to call

    7.6%
  1. illpucks

    illpucks Registered User

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Messages:
    17,009
    Likes Received:
    2,287
    Trophy Points:
    156
    who is better
     
  2. shelf

    shelf Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    91
    Location:
    London ONtario
    '15-'16 Kane had a 19% lead on the next point getter and factored in on 45% of his teams goals. Kucherov has a %14 lead on Mackinnon. Kucherov factors in on 40% of his teams goals.
     
  3. Breakers

    Breakers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,743
    Likes Received:
    2,422
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    An argument could be made for Kane still being in his peak

    What he is doing this year on THIS Chicago team is pretty amazing.
     
  4. Sayonara77

    Sayonara77 # Fire Benning/Wbrod

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    1,543
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Peak Kane > Current Kucherov > Current Kane
     
  5. EXTRAS

    EXTRAS Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2012
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    775
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Not really. Players do well on bad teams all the time. Mcdavid anyone?
     
    travis scott and The Macho Man like this.
  6. Breakers

    Breakers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,743
    Likes Received:
    2,422
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    That doesnt dispute anything I just about a player still being in his peak.

    You're mistaking team success and individual success.
     
  7. bathdog

    bathdog Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    46
    This. But they're reasonably close atm.
     
  8. Ainec

    Ainec RIP Canucks 2̶0̶1̶4̶-̶1̶8̶ 2014-23

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,064
    Likes Received:
    4,146
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Kucherov

    easily

    a lot of Kane's prestige came from being a young too 3 winger on a dynasty

    meanwhile Kucherov has been battling league mvp b2b
     
    Canucks777 likes this.
  9. Salmonsnake

    Salmonsnake Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2016
    Messages:
    3,892
    Likes Received:
    963
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Tampa is still a playoff team without Kucherov.
     
  10. Regal

    Regal Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    14,902
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Kane dominated an Art Ross and Hart one year and finished 2nd in scoring the next...
     
  11. Regal

    Regal Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    14,902
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Vancouver
    I would say Kucherov has better competition though. League scoring is up, so the difference isn't as large as the point totals suggest, but I think there was also a clear lull among top talent from '13-14 to 16-17 outside of Crosby, Kane and McDavid's Art Ross wins
     
  12. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    Sure it does. Kane is 6th in points and 6th in PPG. That is nowhere close to what he did in his peak season. That his team is not as high in the standings as they were in 15/16 should have no relevance on qualifying this as being close to his peak.

    Getting back to the OP, I think Kucherov's run since 16/17 to now is on par with Kane's run from 14/15 to 16/17 and Kucherov's 18/19 season is pacing towards matching Kane's 15/16 season.
     
  13. ref19

    ref19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2017
    Messages:
    997
    Likes Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Gender:
    Male
    Kane no question about it.
     
  14. alexgreeen

    alexgreeen Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2018
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Gender:
    Male
    Kucherov
     
  15. Regal

    Regal Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    14,902
    Likes Received:
    2,784
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Vancouver
    It's not as good, but the 5 in front of him are also having ridiculous seasons. The quality of competition is up right now.

    And while playing on a bad team doesn't necessarily make it harder to score, losing Panarin and Keith regressing does.
     
    Breakers likes this.
  16. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    18,692
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    I would say that there are 4 to 5 players who are having better seasons than Kane's competition in 16/17. That Kucherov is clear of that group puts his season on par with Kane's.

    I would bet that their respective points/PPG's vs. the average points/PPG's of the next 20 scorers is close.

    As for your comment on Panarin and Keith, I agree that Kane's peak season was an anomaly which is why it needs to be qualified that it should be referred to as a peak season, rather than anything that was sustainable.

    Kane's 3 year peak sees him as a Top 3 point producer, meaning he could challenge for an Art Ross in any given year (obviously sans Wayne and Mario).

    If Kucherov can win the Ross this year, I would say the same about his last three seasons.
     
  17. Sidmieux

    Sidmieux Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2013
    Messages:
    8,625
    Likes Received:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Kane has been league mvp lol. Also has a playoff mvp. This is Kane easily. Last year Kucherov was third in scoring and he will not hold on too the scoring lead. This year
     
    KirkAlbuquerque likes this.
  18. Sidmieux

    Sidmieux Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2013
    Messages:
    8,625
    Likes Received:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly all kuch has done is finished third in scoring and this year will probably finish second.
     
  19. Peggy

    Peggy Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2016
    Messages:
    4,975
    Likes Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    94
    "All the time"

    "Best player in the league anyone?"
     
  20. JoVel

    JoVel Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2017
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    7,523
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Finland
    It does make Kane's 2015-16 look better but it's really not that good of an argument. Say Crosby gets 100 points as well that season. Is Kane then somehow a worse player than he would be if Crosby didn't have a good season as well?
     
  21. JoVel

    JoVel Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2017
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    7,523
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Finland
    And Hedman was better the season he was 3rd in the Norris voting than the season he actually won it. It's not as simple as 1st > 2nd no matter what.
     
  22. Hattrick Kane

    Hattrick Kane Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2018
    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    1,951
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    I think currently Kane is factoring in on like 48% of the teams goals.
     
  23. The Macho Man

    The Macho Man Lusty Bodychecker

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    39,419
    Likes Received:
    13,931
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Why is the quality of a team's 2nd - 4th lines relevant in comparing players on the first line? Does anyone think that, since Kucherov only factors in on (idontknow, 35%) of Tampa's goals, teams decide "**** it, let's make sure we shut down that Anthony Cirelli line". They are the focus of the team's shutdown efforts and they produce. The fact that players also produce behind one of them and not the other is irrelevant.
     
  24. GreeningOil

    GreeningOil Yarpmeister

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Safety Officer
    Location:
    Saskatoon
    Absolutely it helps, it also helps having a second line center that is top 10 in scoring. The team is an absolute monster and no doubt teams decide to shut down Point or Kucherov! Not to mention the great defense that can also pass and score....
     
  25. The Macho Man

    The Macho Man Lusty Bodychecker

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2011
    Messages:
    39,419
    Likes Received:
    13,931
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Point has played about 2/3rds of the season with Kucherov, so I'm guessing you confused him with Stamkos.

    And teams absolutely focus on Kucherov as the primary threat. It is absolutely stupid to think otherwise. Shutting down lines 2-4 are no doubt also a concern, but the primary concern is "don't let the guy who's putting up totals last seen by Mario Lemieux get 5 points" rather than gameplanning around the kid who has 11 goals on the 4th line.

    Depth helps the team win, absolutely. It doesn't help Kucherov rack up more points.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"