Krajicek vs. Klesla

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Fifty#15, Jun 3, 2007.

View Users: View Users
  1. Fifty#15

    Fifty#15 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which one of these old-time prospects has the best offensive potential?
     
  2. Velociraptor

    Velociraptor Registered User

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    10,953
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Big Smoke
    As a Canucks fan, When Columbus came to Vancouver, Klesla played 5 1/2 more minutes than kraijcek did, and kraijcek got +2 and 1 assist. He played very well that game
     
  3. KeithBWhittington

    KeithBWhittington Going North

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    10,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brick by Brick
    Home Page:
    Rusty... He's finally beginning to look like the guy that Columbus drafter 4th overall in 00.

    he was used more on the PP this season and has a very hard Shot.
     
  4. sc37

    sc37 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,577
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    OH-IO
    Home Page:
    That means something cause.......?

    I'd say offensive potential is a push...with Klesla having more of a all-around game.
     
  5. JeromeHP

    JeromeHP Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    9,793
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Montreal
    Home Page:
    This should be in the nhl thread not the nhl draft/prospect board
     
  6. Free Edler

    Free Edler Enjoy retirement, boys.

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,809
    Likes Received:
    4,763
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    ad copywriter
    Location:
    Surrey, BC
    I'm a Canucks fan but I'd still take Klesla.
     
  7. pitseleh

    pitseleh Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    18,446
    Likes Received:
    292
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Agreed. Krajicek has a good outlet pass, but he hasn't really shown any significant PP QB upside and doesn't have a great shot. Klesla, on the other hand, has a good shot that should net him his share of goals. Plus he'll probably get more time on the first PP unit, while Vancouver has Bieksa, Salo and Ohlund ahead of Krajicek on the PP depth chart.
     
  8. Sore Loser

    Sore Loser Sorest of them all

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    7,173
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Occupation:
    Job?
    Location:
    Spokane, WA.
    My jaw dropped when I saw Klesla shoot the puck at times last year, I knew he could shoot, but it's surprising to see how well he can do it when you look at his stats. I would say that offensively, he needs to become a more consistent player, make the smart plays.

    Defensively, he is already showing that he can go for the big hit at times, but he takes himself out of the play to do so. He still has some growing to do, but I would take him over Krajicek, he just has more upside.
     
  9. God

    God Free Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    7,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Oh, I wish Klesla was on the Canucks. I love this kid.

    Pretty much a no brainer here.
     
  10. Szechwan

    Szechwan Plug Life.

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,398
    Likes Received:
    433
    Trophy Points:
    124
    I'd still take klesla over krajicek, despite being Canuck fan...though Krajicek certainly improved defensively in the last portion of the regular season and was solid in the playoffs. If he can continue his development and maybe bulk up a bit, He could probably has to the potential to be a top 4 d-man on most teams.

    He ceratinly doesnt have the shot klesla does but if he were to take a page out of Bieksa's book and just concentrate on getting the puck to the net, he'd be a lot more succesful on the PP. Both are solid "up and comers" flying under the radar, I'd be happy with either of the two on my team.
     
  11. Klesla anyday.

    I shudder whenever I see Krajicek on the ice.
     
  12. hockeyfan125

    hockeyfan125 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Messages:
    20,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    uh? Krajicek was fantastic most of the season, went through a month where he wasn't very good, but recovered and was great again in both playoff series.
     
  13. I dont argue with you taking Klesla. However as the playoffs went on Krajicek played real real good hockey. Infact the best hockey of his career was playing during the playoffs this year. He looked so confident with the puck.
     
  14. He's gotten better, yes, but he still makes many stupid mistakes.

    I'd take Krajicek over Sopel though :D
     
  15. krajicek is an alright nhl dman as of right now..i think last year with the canucks..he showed he was capable of being a no5 guy ...his game really improved as the seasons went on...


    Top end potential i say Krajicek by half a step

    Who would i rather have??.....Klesla..because i think he is a bit further along in his development and i think he will become the better player of the 2....but who knows..maybe in 3 -4 years lukas becomes 40-50pt guy
     
  16. Free Edler

    Free Edler Enjoy retirement, boys.

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,809
    Likes Received:
    4,763
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    ad copywriter
    Location:
    Surrey, BC
    He was solid in the playoffs, I'll give you that, he really showed off his excellent skating ability and passing talent, but let's not kid ourselves. He was very average in the regular season, and for a guy who got power play time like he did, he should have put up a lot more points, especially when you look at the fact that he was supposedly an offensive defenseman.
     
  17. hockeyfan125

    hockeyfan125 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Messages:
    20,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    why? He isn't an offensive defenseman and he has a weak shot. Krajicek is fundamentally solid defensively, is a great skater, and has a very good outlet pass. He will never put up huge totals offensively. He was definitely not "very average." From October to early December, he was very good. He struggled for most of January, but found his game again down the stretch. He stepped up even further in the playoffs with our injuries to the top-four. I don't think I'd take him over Klesla, but he is getting the short end in this thread.
     
  18. pitseleh

    pitseleh Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    18,446
    Likes Received:
    292
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Vancouver
    I agree. He had a stretch of a couple months where he was very shaky (mostly as he was paired with Rory), but for the first couple months of the season and down the stretch, he looked like a top-4 dman, IMO. At worst, he was a very good #5 who can step into the top-4 if needed.
     
  19. Fifty#15

    Fifty#15 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    thanks for the feedback everyone...
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"