Goose312
Registered User
- May 15, 2015
- 1,328
- 350
Without question, yes. Pretty heavy over payment from Chicago there.Hey guys. Would you trade kaprizov for the 3rd overall + dylan strome?
Just Curious
Without question, yes. Pretty heavy over payment from Chicago there.Hey guys. Would you trade kaprizov for the 3rd overall + dylan strome?
Just Curious
If it were a sure thing, why would they trade the draft pick? Sometimes....who at #3 is a sure thing to be better than kaprizov? i vote no.
who at #3 is a sure thing to be better than kaprizov? i vote no.
who at #3 is a sure thing to be better than kaprizov? i vote no.
Wouldn't the #3 pick produce a potential superstar? Not to mention adding a young potential long term top 6 center. Would you trade Kaprizov for 1st overall? At what point does the offer become enough to bypass giving up a potential superstar?you want to trade the only potential superstar we've had since gabby? veto from me.
you want to trade the only potential superstar we've had since gabby? veto from me.
Realistically I doubt they would.why would they do it if its such a good deal for us?
52 points out of a 22 year old center isnt convincing?There are ( supposedly) two stars in this draft, one top pairing Dman, then a bunch of forwards who are hard to differentiate. Turcotte is by no means a much better bet to succeed in the NHL than Newhook, Kreba, Zegras, et al.
Kaprizov has successfully jumped througH every hoop possible without playing in the NHL. Still not a sure thing, but he certainly has the potential to be legit 1st liner. Are we sure we want to trade that for a less certain player?
Count me in as less than convinced about Strome.
One has to wonder if we get Arizona Strome or Chicago Strome, especially when we don't have a Kane to play him next to.52 points out of a 22 year old center isnt convincing?
52 points out of a 22 year old center isnt convincing?
why would they do it if its such a good deal for us?
my bad, forgot his stats were 57 not 52 thanks for the correction.57 points in 78 games. 51 in 58 in Chicago. Your point stands.
They wouldn’t. They wouldn’t even consider it.
One has to wonder if we get Arizona Strome or Chicago Strome, especially when we don't have a Kane to play him next to.
Yeah, I couldn't find hard numbers on linemates, just an article from mid-season about the two of them.Probably somewhere in the middle, though I don't believe he played much with Kane.
I'm not looking to get rid Kaprizov, and I don't think Chicago would in any way consider it, but going from a very, very questionable future at the center position to a Turcotte/Strome/Eriksson Ek future would be pretty appealing.
If you think that Kaprizov is still a flight risk, you take #3/Strome and run. If you are confident that he is coming, you keep him.
I wonder what GMPF would do?
If you think that Kaprizov is still a flight risk, you take #3/Strome and run. If you are confident that he is coming, you keep him.
I wonder what GMPF would do?
If you think that Kaprizov is still a flight risk, you take #3/Strome and run. If you are confident that he is coming, you keep him.
I wonder what GMPF would do?
GMPF would probably tell them to just keep #3 and do Kaprizov for Strome straight up.
does he remind you of any one NHL player?In today's Finland - Russia semifinal, I think Kaprizov was the most dangerous Russian player on the ice, in a team with Ovechkin, Kucherov, Kuznetsov, Kovalchuk, Malkin & co. I want to see him in a Wild sweater so badly. What a talent.