kings: alzner or kane?

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by LAKings88, Feb 4, 2007.

View Users: View Users
  1. LAKings88

    LAKings88 Formerly KOTR

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,283
    Likes Received:
    529
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Westeros
    the kings will most likely end up with the second pick this year if they do not trade down jump or get jumped in the lotto. there is great debate amongst kings fans over who would be the better player for LA to take. please weigh in with your opinion on the matter. i understand either of these two might go #1 overall as well. if the kings have the choice who should they take and why? would alzner be one of the highest rated d in previous drafts? should the kings draft for need? a little information from outside of the kings fanbase would be most welcome. thanks for your time.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2007
  2. no name

    no name Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Rep for The Agency Group
    Location:
    Tornado Alley
    Home Page:
    Kane.
     
  3. Herby

    Herby Culture Changer

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    20,140
    Likes Received:
    1,622
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Chicago
    I'd be pretty pissed if the Kings pass on Kane.

    Kane would be an ideal winger for Kopitar.
     
  4. Westguy13

    Westguy13 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not KC...
    Drafting for need is the biggest mistake you can ever make in the NHL. Draft the best player always. I'd say Alzner though. I expect Kane to go 3-7. Top defensmen don't come around every draft. Not to mention a JJ-Alzner pairing could be fun to watch.
     
  5. Reaper45

    Reaper45 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    33,739
    Likes Received:
    988
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Turris. Just a hunch.
     
  6. LAKings88

    LAKings88 Formerly KOTR

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,283
    Likes Received:
    529
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Westeros
    honest question because i don't know to much about his game-is he really that good? what can you resonably compare him to?
     
  7. Westguy13

    Westguy13 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not KC...
    Do I think he's that good? No, he's no EJ. He's a capable d man, strong in all areas of the game. He has good mobility but not quite as physical as some would like. I see him as a future top 2 d-man but not a franchise player or anything.

    I'm just going between Alzner and Kane. I think there are other players that would be good choices at #2. I think Kane is overhyped. He's a very skilled kid but I don't see him in the top 2.
     
  8. Playa Hamm*

    Playa Hamm* Guest

    We need defenseman in our pipeline.

    However, if Patrick Kane is truly a better prospect than Alzner, then Dean has to take him. We can trade him or one of our other forwards later for defensive depth. If they are relatively close in terms of talent/upside, then I take Alzner.
     
  9. Westguy13

    Westguy13 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not KC...
    Let me put it this way. For every 5 forwards with Kanes talent theres 1 defensmen with Alzners talent. Good forward prospects aren't a rarity. There for Alzner has more value to a franchise then Kane.
     
  10. kingpin_19

    kingpin_19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drumheller, AB
    Yeah, but I think its likely the Kings sign Jack Johnson next season. That gives them one blue-chip defenseman already, so no need to take Alznar. Likely to be Kane, unless Philly snaps him up first...
     
  11. kingpest19

    kingpest19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2004
    Messages:
    11,497
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    131
    It never hurts to have good prospects in the system no matter if they are forwards or d. Defense is the weak spot in the Kings system right now. That being said if they are comparable take the dman.
     
  12. Westguy13

    Westguy13 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not KC...
    Like I said earlier taking a player based on need is the biggest mistake a GM can make. Always take the best player available. That said there are better forwards in the draft then Kane. I really don't see Kane going 1st overall like alot of people on these boards.
     
  13. Ziggy Stardust

    Ziggy Stardust Master Debater

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    49,706
    Likes Received:
    6,639
    Trophy Points:
    241
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    Lombardi has said that if there is a defenseman who is equal to a forward, he will take the defenseman. If he feels that Alzner is as good as any other forward prospect in the 07 draft, then I don't see him passing up on him.

    My personal opinion, I'd like to see Turris go #2. He is one of the youngest kids eligible for the draft and has more of a time frame to develop and progress into a top line center.

    Look at how the Penguins drafted centers for the past three consecutive drafts. I think it has worked out pretty well for them.
     
  14. kingpest19

    kingpest19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2004
    Messages:
    11,497
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    131
    If they feel that the player they are taking is the best player available while also addressing a need then you have to pick that player. And right now the Kings have decent depth at the forward positions while the blue line is thin. If DL feels that Alzner is the BPA and it addresses a need I will have no problem with the pick.
     
  15. Seph

    Seph Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    17,421
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Oregon
    Home Page:
    But that assumes there is a best player available. That's not always the case. This draft is unique in that there are a number of players with very little separating them, if anything at all, in terms of quality as a prospect. In the event that a team does not see any prospect as being better than the others, there's nothing wrong with going by need.
     
  16. Venom_17

    Venom_17 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,093
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    DL has a chub for Dmen. Can't see him passing on Alzner if he is there...probably trading down to get the kid.
     
  17. Frolov 6'3

    Frolov 6'3 Unregistered User

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    10,334
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Alexei Cherepanov is da man !
     
  18. Panopticon

    Panopticon Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Helsinki
    Both good choices. Depends on whether you want a really potent offense or a more balanced team. I think you guys have needs in both areas, but I would probably pick the D-man at this point (since they take longer to develope) and a forward next year (let's be honest, you'll be sucking next year as well... ;))
     
  19. pc_md

    pc_md Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    76
    If you got the 2nd overall pick. I guess you're right (assuming there is a BPA...). But when you got the 28th pick, drafting by need is a wise move.
     
  20. Panopticon

    Panopticon Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Helsinki
    But even at 28th, what if you need a defenseman and you can clearly see that there's a much more promising center available (than any D-man)?

    Do you still take the D-man and pass on the talented center, or take the talented center and let him develope a while and then see if you still need a D-man and trade the developed center for a possibly better D-man than the one that you could've picked in the draft. Of course, things aren't this simple usually, but I don't see how it matters if it's the 28th pick or the 2nd.

    This year, drafting for need in the Top 10 is probably easier than in years. The top 10 is pretty even in talent at this point (although there's not too many D-men in that top10 and if I needed a D-man I would take Alzner if he was available no matter who else was left). Hell, you could even draft for need with the first pick this year (maybe not for D or G, but at least you can choose between a C and a winger).
     
  21. hawksfan50

    hawksfan50 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Frolov Kopitar Kane --the Kings may have a deadly offensive threat with that combo ..they take Kane if he''s not off the board...they already have the LW+C --just need RW to complete the picture...the 2K's providing exceptional puck handling +pssing skills as well as good shooters,and Frolov the quintessential finisher..IF Kane gets on that line --look out--Frolov could get 60 goals...if Kane wet #1 however and LA drafted at #2--would they dare go to Cherepanov as the RW ? An all euro line? 2 Russkies on their top line? I wonder...they might instead go for 2nd good centre behind Kopitar (Turris,Gagner,Esposito) or go for Alzner to shore up their D...
     
  22. Eshutz Escors

    Eshutz Escors Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A lot of this may depend on what DL does between now and the deadline. If he is able to swing another Jack Johnson type deal, then perhaps he leans towards taking a forward. If not, then I suspect he would go after a d-man.
     
  23. mogs

    mogs Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Jasper AB
    Wow. The Kings are going to be good pretty soon. They have Kopitar, Johnson, Frolov, Cammaleri, and whoever they draft this year.

    Do they have a goalie?
     
  24. Juskevich

    Juskevich Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Finland
    Jonathan Bernier
    And don't forget O'Sullivan ;)
     
  25. rajuabju

    rajuabju The One & Only

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,967
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    And Tukonen. He's had an injury this year so everyone's forgotten about him... but he's still a top prospect.

    Oh, and Lewis, and Boyle.

    We're gonna suck this year. We're gonna suck next year. But after that, the future is looking pretty darn good.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"