Jussi
Registered User
NHL must be an even bushier league since 15 teams left for financial reasons
Big difference being there wasn't a salary cap in place in the NHL in those days. KHL clubs are failing despite a salary cap. Want to try again?
NHL must be an even bushier league since 15 teams left for financial reasons
Big difference being there wasn't a salary cap in place in the NHL in those days. KHL clubs are failing despite a salary cap. Want to try again?
I don't understand how exactly a salary cap saves things for incompetency of boards. If Lev's (or Spartak's or whatever you want) board is not able to manage their money, they can have a salary cap of 1 euro, yet they'll have to fold their teams
When a salary cap is tied to league revenue and includes revenue sharing, that creates an environment where financial issues should not be large enough to take down clubs. Point is, if the salary cap in KHL would have at say 25 million euros since the beginning, would players salaries/costs have inflated to the level they are now? NHL has learned from mistakes in the past, KHL bosses could have studied those mistakes and made sure it wouldn't happen there. But they didn't.
NHL must be an even bushier league since 15 teams left for financial reasons
Well, we can also remember that they had franchises that lasted for 2 seasons as well, it was back in the 1970s. But when was the last time they lost a contending team in a major market? 1917?
Reasonable spending works everywhere.NA economic rules don't apply to European/Russian ones and viceversa
The Jets left Winnipeg in '96 if I am not mistaken, that's not an age ago. Also, Prague and Lev were cool, no one denies that, but it's like a team in Mexico City (meaning outside of Canada and USA)
Reasonable spending works everywhere.
Your mentality is exactly why KHL is struggling.
Struggling in what? Some teams left, other teams came
Winnipeg is not a major market and the Jets didn't have winning records back then, they also won only two playoff series in their entire NHL history.The Jets left Winnipeg in '96 if I am not mistaken, that's not an age ago. Also, Prague and Lev were cool, no one denies that, but it's like a team in Mexico City (meaning outside of Canada and USA)
Your mentality is exactly why KHL is struggling.
I wouldn't say that the KHL is struggling at all
I think that the KHL is easily a European hockey project of the decade even with its problems. Nothing comes close in accomplishment and quality of hockey. The only comparable project to the geographic conditions is the EBEL.
Yeah, when in comes to European hockey, Czech Republic is totally like Mexico.
But isn't that what I'm saying? You're not able to spend well = you're out of the league!
Very few teams in the league are able to spend (waste money at enormous rates) well. It started as a barely sustainable project and six years later nothing has changed.
What accomplishment?
NHL started as a Canadian league and later aimed at the entire North American market. In this context, Prague is more like Boston or Detroit.I meant "they created a team and they put it outside of Russia"
Tell me one hockey project in Europe in the last 10 years that has done this:
-increased the amount of money circulating in the league by multiples of previous levels
-brought quality hockey to completely new locations
-offered an alternative to young players before leaving to North America at very young age
-placed such high amount of players on national teams
-didn't let the NHL take every player they wanted for low price
-created a competitive junior league that is an interesting option for clubs from all over Europe
Taking measures to improve financial stability of your league is a good thing, slowly killing it is not. Prague was one of the most important achievements of the KHL expansion agenda, failure of that project is the biggest loss for the league so far.And thus why banning teams who can't finance themselves is a bad thing?
Taking measures to improve financial stability of your league is a good thing, slowly killing it is not. Prague was one of the most important achievements of the KHL expansion agenda, failure of that project is the biggest loss for the league so far.
Tell me one hockey project in Europe in the last 10 years that has done this:
-increased the amount of money circulating in the league by multiples of previous levels
-brought quality hockey to completely new locations
-offered an alternative to young players before leaving to North America at very young age
-placed such high amount of players on national teams
-didn't let the NHL take every player they wanted for low price
-created a competitive junior league that is an interesting option for clubs from all over Europe
Some of these things can be said about the EBEL. The EBEL league is great too, even if not at the KHL level.
Although, frankly speaking, there won't be a salary cap next season, they're putting a luxury tax threshold, which is similar to the one MLB has, instead. They already tried that before.Well, you're right on the first part. Actually the "luxury tax" on the salary cap is a thing with whom they're trying to solve these problems. Whether it will work or not it's yet to be seen.