What? 2nd round picks do not equal top line players. Top 5 picks are expected to be top line players, beyond that it becomes much less predictable. Hell, even top 5 any more is unpredictable. A 2nd round pick that plays in the NHL and contributes is a nice benefit but the odds still remain very low they become top line players outside the 1st round. Expect middle 6 and at least 3 years of development time. Stenlund is right there. He's more likely top 9 but has developed well thus far.He's a second round pick from five years ago so he shouldn't be just a shot in the dark. Goodness do the Blue Jackets have trouble drafting top line players.
Top 6 players come from somewhere. A second round pick should be closer to a top 6 than just another guy skating around.What? 2nd round picks do not equal top line players. Top 5 picks are expected to be top line players, beyond that it becomes much less predictable. Hell, even top 5 any more is unpredictable. A 2nd round pick that plays in the NHL and contributes is a nice benefit but the odds still remain very low they become top line players outside the 1st round. Expect middle 6 and at least 3 years of development time. Stenlund is right there. He's more likely top 9 but has developed well thus far.
He won’t be at that level, but he could probably hit 30 points one day. Maybe like 10-15 goals.Patrick Berglund 2.0
For the record, outside of the first round of the 2015 draft there are 3, maybe 4, players that would likely be considered top 6 talent. Sebastian Aho (2nd round), Anthony Cirelli (3rd) and maybe Roope Hintz (2nd - although only 90 NHL game) and/or Dominik Simon (5th). I guess one may argue Conor Garlard (5th, 88 games with 27 goals). To me, that's being generous and trying to find a player that is roughly a 40 or 40+ pt player.Top 6 players come from somewhere. A second round pick should be closer to a top 6 than just another guy skating around.