A relatively tepid take...
1) People keep looking at individual production. Look at unit production. Phil's done very little positive with Geno for the last 2 years overall compared to our other options. His PP impact is debatably around 5 goals over a season. You're probably not getting anyone to get his points totals but in terms of a team goals going down, the amount mightn't be as big as it looks.
2) I like the top end and low end of this deal more than Zucker. Players do great, Galchenyuk and POJ can do a lot more for the Pens now and in the future. Players do bad, we're not on the hook for that contract. Players work out as you expect, then probably better off with Zucker, but it can still work out with this deal.
3) Another thing I like about the deal is if we're thinking later in the season "This team is great but missing something top end" then the flexibility of that expiring contract and that extra desirable future helps us compared to the Zucker deal too.
4) This isn't what Kessel was worth in a vacuum. But I think this might have been worth what Kessel was actually doing for us.
I dunno. Right now, I'm feeling okay with it, a little impressed with the value Rutherford got, little nervous about the next move - and lets make no mistake, this has to be one of a series of moves.