PecaFan
Registered User
In a discussion about Kesler and whether the Canucks can use arbitration to attempt to lower his salary in the future, Wetcoaster has claimed that somehow contracts resulting from offer sheets are different than "normal" contracts, so this:
12.3 (a) (i):
"If a Player who is otherwise eligible to receive a Qualifying Offer
and become a Group 2 Restricted Free Agent had a Paragraph 1
NHL Salary plus Signing, Roster and Reporting Bonuses in excess
of $1,500,000 in the aggregate in the final League Year of his most
recent SPC, a Club may elect to file for salary arbitration to
determine the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary for the upcoming
League Year in lieu of making a Qualifying Offer to such Player."
provision doesn't apply to Kesler.
http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p=7102927#post7102927
Any of our CBA gurus heard of such a thing? I hadn't heard of it.
12.3 (a) (i):
"If a Player who is otherwise eligible to receive a Qualifying Offer
and become a Group 2 Restricted Free Agent had a Paragraph 1
NHL Salary plus Signing, Roster and Reporting Bonuses in excess
of $1,500,000 in the aggregate in the final League Year of his most
recent SPC, a Club may elect to file for salary arbitration to
determine the Player's Paragraph 1 Salary for the upcoming
League Year in lieu of making a Qualifying Offer to such Player."
provision doesn't apply to Kesler.
http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p=7102927#post7102927
Any of our CBA gurus heard of such a thing? I hadn't heard of it.