Blind Gardien said:
It's not entirely coincidental that a glance at the top-20 or so NHL scorers shows a certain paucity of Canadian names. Of course, this is an ages old and pages long debate, so I better stop here.
I do not think a glance at the top scorers in the NHL will give you much indication on the current state of the CHL vs other developmental leagues around the world. Some of the players in the top 20 scorers have almost two decades of NHL hockey behind them. Mark Recchi has something like 16-17 seasons. Looking at him will hardly indicate what is wrong or right about the WHL
today.
Then you have to account some of those players really blossomed very late, not in developmental leagues but in pro leagues. Some did in farm leagues and some did it in different developmental leagues (I think Hossa is the only example in the top 20, having played one year only in the WHL and previously in Slovakia).
A glance at the top 20 scorers this year reveals that 50% come from the CHL. How much would be enough, I ask you? 90%? If we add the two US College players, we're up to 12/20 North American products.
Here it is:
RW Martin St. Louis, US College
LW Ilya Kovalchuk, RUSIA
C Joe Sakic, WHL
LW Markus Naslund, Sweden
RW Marian Hossa, Slovakia/WHL
C Patrik Elias, Czech Republic
RW Daniel Alfredsson, Sweden
LW Cory Stillman, OHL
C Robert Lang, Czech Republic
C Brad Richards, QMJHL
LW Alex Tanguay, QMJHL
C Mats Sundin, Sweden
RW Mark Recchi, WHL
RW Milan Hejduk, Czech Republic
RW Jaromir Jagr, Czech Republic
RW Steve Sullivan, OHL
RW Jarome Iginla, WHL
C Joe Thornton, OHL
LW Keith Tkachuk, US College
C Scott Gomez, WHL
Furthermore, I'm not sure if offensive performance by the top 20 is the be-all, end-all method to evaluate developmental league performances. I'll take plenty of guys not in the top 20 before Cory Stillman and live very well with the decision.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the CHL. This is a pure myth. It's still a strong league, and it will continue to produce nice NHLers. We can expect a drop in representation if international hockey continues its breakthrough. There is nothing wrong with that, we're all winners when quality overall improves.
Our players do, on average, play a slightly different style. Each league has its "specialties" but plenty of players not cut from the same mold. Furthermore, over the years "specialties" will change. Leagues will adapt, evolve. I think the 90s was the last decade where we will see such a stranglehold on goaltending by the Q. There have been vast improvements all over the world in that respect.
Furthermore, I doubt much of this has to do with the red line. I'd guess the fact they do a couple more drills, less games and at least until recently less of a NHL-style grinding game is more at the heart of the differences. Note that I call these *differences* as opposed to saying one is better than the other.
I truly believe that there is no one perfect way to develop prospects, but there are optimal ways depending on the guy. There are plenty of pitfalls for the European path of development (also a generalization, no two Euro country is alike), just like there are in every leagues, like the CHL.