Funny, you used this exact argument in reverse yesterday to claim that Hedman should have an easier time scoring than Doughty because he’s on a great team with a great offense.
That's not what I said. Don't misrepresent me, and no reason to bring that garbage here since you didn't have the guts or facts to properly address my claims in that thread either. You're overly simplifying our discussion of rates, deployment, as percentage of offense as if it was just "hurr tb scores more so hedman should score more." I was only pointing out your false claim that Hedman had a head-and-shoulders better offensive season than Doughty...but it was only a 3 point difference despite major differences in usage and team situations.
My point as it relates to THIS thread is that all the offense (especially from the defense) in Ottawa was funneled through Karlsson; that will not be the case in San Jose where they also have Burns in addition to other weapons like Thornton to create plays. Some people like to say this will get Karlsson to 90 points, but I think it's more likely that both guys settle down around 70. That's still stellar/elite, it's just that on teams that score in the neighborhood of 300 goals versus the teams that are scoring 200, it usually signals depth of offense rather than one guy getting 150 points. I think he'll be a better all-around player, but his points will drop slightly.