Karlsson on Broadway

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Oct 23, 2014
28,356
39,705
I don’t part with any assets for Karlsson. Let him reach UFA status, and let’s wait and see where the Rangers are in a year before considering a pursuit.

And if he would consider a signing a contract ~50% of market value.
 

darko

Registered User
Feb 16, 2009
70,265
7,786
I would consider Zib + Tampa con. pick + Pionk for him, but he is worth a lot more than that so I really doubt Erik will end up with Rangers in the 2018-19 season. :)

Again why trade good assets for potentially 1 year of EK? It's stupid and you are shooting yourself in a foot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers743

Elliman

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
1,040
469
New York
Sens would want nothing to do with Shat or Hayes. Pionk has no real value to anyone but NYR.

Think Anderson/Chytil, Skeij+

Exactly why I’d make the original move and not our elite/top prospects and higher valued picks. Even though quite a few people don’t like my trade I think the Sens would laugh at it and reject it flat out.
 

darko

Registered User
Feb 16, 2009
70,265
7,786
I would assume if Rangers did this move they would have a gentleman’s agreement in place for an extension. Apologies for not including that.

Yeah I'd like to see pen on paper and not a gentleman's agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elliman

Siddi

Rangers Masochist
Mar 8, 2013
7,476
4,762
Global
Yeah I'd like to see pen on paper and not a gentleman's agreement.

Just a thought,

OTT could sign him for max years and whatever AAV Karlsson and the Rangers decide on and then move him and the contract to us.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->