High five Tom
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2012
- 662
- 278
Missed the playoff series a few years ago between the sens and bruins i guess.tough questions. If I want to win a cup this year, I take Bergeron. But Karlsson is younger. Karlsson is also off contract after this year, and I think he will get a contract he's not worth.
I think I take Bergeron.
Ouch how embarrassingBergeron better offensively and defensively.
Except when they play head to head i guess.Bergeron without hesitation.
Bruins, Hawks and Kings have won enough cups for me to believe that a Selke caliber 1C is more valuable than anything for a playoffs run.
Bergeron has modern-day peers... and they're good players [Kopitar, Toews kinda/sorta]
Karlsson has historical peers... and they're great players [Leetch is a strong comparable, were it not for Karlsson's speed-bump season last year.] So- unless Karlsson's hiccup turns into a Langway-esque Swan Dive, I'll favor Karlsson.
Bergeron without hesitation.
Bruins, Hawks and Kings have won enough cups for me to believe that a Selke caliber 1C is more valuable than anything for a playoffs run.
Best offensive D vs best defensive forward. Who is more valuable in your opinion?
Rielly and Green ? Get out of here.Karlsson has modern day peers as well.
Burns' current 4 year run is arguably as good as Karlsson's.
Burns: 75, 76, 65, 83
EK: 74, 66, 82, 71
Reilly just put up 72
Mike Green scored 73 in 65 games, and 76 in 75 games in consecutive years.
Every single time Bergeron plays against the best, he wins he matchup. He will shut your guy down, and score on you (see 2013 Pittsburgh)
Those aren't peers.Karlsson has modern day peers as well.
Burns' current 4 year run is arguably as good as Karlsson's.
Burns: 75, 76, 65, 83
EK: 74, 66, 82, 71
Reilly just put up 72
Mike Green scored 73 in 65 games, and 76 in 75 games in consecutive years.
Every single time Bergeron plays against the best, he wins he matchup. He will shut your guy down, and score on you (see 2013 Pittsburgh)
Those aren't peers.
Burns is the only one remotely close, and despite Burns having a better season (staying healthy helps), Karlsson is better.
Rielly? Give me a break. Green? Nope.
I said despite Burns having a better season.Don't most Sharks fans think Burns is better this season?
Karlsson has modern day peers as well.
Burns' current 4 year run is arguably as good as Karlsson's.
Burns: 75, 76, 65, 83
EK: 74, 66, 82, 71
Reilly just put up 72
Mike Green scored 73 in 65 games, and 76 in 75 games in consecutive years.
Every single time Bergeron plays against the best, he wins he matchup. He will shut your guy down, and score on you (see 2013 Pittsburgh)
I said despite Burns having a better season.