Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 19,856
- 8,339
Sure, maybe you can believe our GM was asking for Matthews if that makes you feel better, but it still doesn’t change the fact that the Leafs GM called about Faulk. So when y’all start declaring that the Leafs have no need for Faulk, you should probably all remember that your GM doesn’t agree with you.
What are you talking about? No one said anything about Matthews. " ...it was a very short discussion" means that he called in the summer. I didn't dispute that. Y’all is a contraction for you all; I am only one person. I summary, I said he did call it was short and I supposed that the ask was much too high for what the Leafs would consider. You should really read and think before you reply. Otherwise what happens, certainly in this case, you reply to a situation that was created by your imagination.