Value of: Juolevi, Olli

Discussion in 'Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk' started by YP44, Oct 29, 2018.

  1. YP44

    YP44 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    17,323
    Likes Received:
    872
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    How has his development been? Is he part of the Canucks future and could he be had and for what?
     
  2. ColoradoCanes

    ColoradoCanes Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2017
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    1,225
    Trophy Points:
    94
    I think he could had.

    Tough to gauge his value though
     
  3. YP44

    YP44 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    17,323
    Likes Received:
    872
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Toughest part to me is to gauge what Vancouver would want. They should not want veterans as they are re-tooling but then again they just signed Roussel
     
  4. ColoradoCanes

    ColoradoCanes Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2017
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    1,225
    Trophy Points:
    94
    The fan base would prefer futures/prospects

    But it’s tough to tell what their front office would actually get
     
    YP44 likes this.
  5. HockeyGuruPitka

    HockeyGuruPitka Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    5,764
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto
    I dont think they'll have any interest in trading him. Develop him and hope he turns into a player.
     
  6. HOPE

    HOPE Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,143
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Montreal
    Lol of course you have a hard time gauging his value if you just ask how was his developpement going.
     
  7. mstad101

    mstad101 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2008
    Messages:
    6,133
    Likes Received:
    236
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Sadly he’s still #2 on the defence core prospect pool. So even though he’s not very good and won’t ever impact the NHL like players chosen around him in the draft, he’s going to be relied upon to be at least an NHL #5 for Vancouver by next season when the Canucks won’t have MDZ, Pouliot and probably Edler/or Hutton not return to its defence core.
    The only type of deal that makes sense to send him out is the worst type of trade for Vancouver. Accelerating the rebuild type of targeting a 22-25 year old now defenceman.
     
  8. Digitalbooya

    Digitalbooya Osiecki death stare

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,288
    Likes Received:
    771
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Indiana/Wisconsin
    Hence the point of this thread.
     
    YP44 likes this.
  9. SmellOfVictory

    SmellOfVictory Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,767
    Likes Received:
    532
    Trophy Points:
    139
    I don't see a reason for Vancouver to trade him, unless it's a situation where another GM loves him and overpays. They need defensive prospects and he's one of their best ones.
     
  10. GoodbyeLuongo

    GoodbyeLuongo Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,588
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Seattle
    Inb4 the basesless posts about how he’s trash. Juolevi’s plus one year wasn’t great but he was really strong last year in Finland and has looked good so far in Utica. He’s really not available by any means.
     
  11. hoyhoy42

    hoyhoy42 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Value would be tough. Slightly less than Sargachev? Talking about a top 5 pick in his 1st season in North America.

    I think his value gets skewed sometimes because fans are pissed the Canucks could have taken Tkachuk. Obviously different players but sometimes I think people de-value him because of it.

    Juolevi has 6 or 7 points in 10 AHL games. Playing over 20 minutes a night and getting top PP time.

    I'm not here saying that he's a Hedman or a Dahlan but.... I think he has top 2 potential.

    I certainly think that Juolevi, Hughes, Brisebois, Woo and Tryamkin are the future.

    Hughes is your #1.
    Juolevi is your #2.
    Tryamkin is your #3.
    Woo is your #4.
    Brisebois is your #5-6.

    Canucks have been so thin for so many years on d prospects that dealing from this position would be totally counter productive.
     
  12. skyo

    skyo Pettersson-Boeser

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    3,235
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    CanucksCorner
    Canucks are rebuilding, are lacking quality D prospects, while Juolevi is developing really well in Utica, plus getting a lot of respect from the coach and GM on his progression.

    All that means is the Canucks are developing him well and will not be moving him, he fits into the franchises rebuild timeline of bringing in all these youngsters these next few years, he'll for sure be a part of the future core Canucks.
     
  13. Breakers

    Breakers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,113
    Likes Received:
    1,847
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    I doubt he would garner a big return.

    He isnt that good. His compete level is terrible.
     
    Ana Crusis likes this.
  14. Cogburn

    Cogburn Registered User

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,478
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Offensively he's great, defensively he needs some time. If we call him up, I hope we have him with Tanev, as the two of them have the makings of a great pairing. Eventually Woo could take that RD spot over too.

    His growth seems to come in spurts, but I'm holding out hope. I don't think he will have a Tkachuk like impact on his team but he could be a very good puck mover or offensive D for us.

    As such I'm treating him as that, inspite of some development he needs. A good, young, top four LHD. We don't have a lot of reasons to trade him, so we won't unless there is a benefit to us. If you have an offer for a different kind of player, I'm sure we would listen.
     
  15. Gaudfather

    Gaudfather Johnny Hockey

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,792
    Likes Received:
    1,534
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Calgary->Minneapolis
    You will hear people calling him a bust for the next few years... standard HF practice for players that take longer to develop.
     
    skyo likes this.
  16. hoyhoy42

    hoyhoy42 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Not sure most would agree there coach.

    World Juniors was a top d man.

    Was a top d man on his mens Finland team last year.

    Playing as top d man in 1st North America season.

    Sounds pretty "compete" to me.

    What's your basis for flaming comment?
     
  17. puckpilot

    puckpilot Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    625
    Trophy Points:
    94
    No point in moving him, unless someone overpays. The Canucks need D prospects, so trading one away isn't exactly a smart thing, especially when he's beginning to show promise.
     
  18. Breakers

    Breakers Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2014
    Messages:
    8,113
    Likes Received:
    1,847
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    "Complete" and "compete" are two different words.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"