Incubajerks
Registered User
We saw that. It was good for a week. Then it was really bad.
I am good with a week of good Jordan/Warren
We saw that. It was good for a week. Then it was really bad.
Foegele is good where he's at. 4th line energy guy who does some PKing. He'll get a chance in the top 9 again if he ever starts producing. Staal, while not producing himself, can at least match up against top lines unlike Foegele.I want to see Jordan with Foegele.
Agree here. That second line with Wallmark in the center has been producing. Wouldn't switch that up right nowI'd start Jordan on the 4th line, replacing McKegg. Give him a couple of games to ease him back in.
Then I'd plug him into the 3rd line w/Martinook and Svech. You all can **** on Lucas Wallmark all you want but he's been solid, not spectacular, but solid. He's a better passer than Staal and, despite the whiffs, I'll take his shot over Staal's as well. At least he can occasionally hit a corner.
While not a beast at the dot, he's got an FO% of 50%....better than Aho's or Martinook's....and equal to McKegg's.
You want to **** up team chemistry, you force Jordan back early into a role he's not ready for and/or hasn't played very well this season. Ease the big guy back in....give him PK responsibility and maybe the occasional tough match up. But don't force the issue until you know what you've got...
Yeah, don't get me wrong....Jordo as a mid-40 point center, playing on the PK, dominating in the circle, and beasting it down low is great and an asset to the team. Eventually, I'd like to see him between Ferland and Teuvo....I just think the people who are all "just plug him in for Wallmark" are not considering the bigger picture. Wallmark as a 3C is fine, even pretty good....the issue is that we've got 5 other tweeners for 4 slots.Agree here. That second line with Wallmark in the center has been producing. Wouldn't switch that up right now