Actually it's you who's completely wrong
Marner is exactly a PPG player in the playoffs and Marchessault is 0.81 PPG in the playoffs.
Looking forward to you not replying to this LMAO
Actually it's you who's completely wrong
Marner is exactly a PPG player in the playoffs and Marchessault is 0.81 PPG in the playoffs.
Looking forward to you not replying to this LMAO
Look at career stats there bud. Not conveniently look At only stats from a career year playing on the top line of a cup finalist.
Oh so we're only going by the most recent playoffs then?I was looking at this past playoffs. Which is more relevant to the discussion.
LMAO for using a 13 game sample size! Good job buddy. You never cease to amaze us of blindly going for the Maple Leaf in every case without question.
21 points in 20 games is way more impressive than 9 in 7. The answer to the poll is Marner regardless.Oh so we're only going by the most recent playoffs then?
Marner still had a better PPG. Keep digging yourself further it's getting hilarious.
Oh so we're only going by the most recent playoffs then?
Marner still had a better PPG. Keep digging yourself further it's getting hilarious.
IPS at it again, cherry picking stats to pump up his beloved leaf player. In the 2015 and 2016 playoffs Marchessaualt was getting 4th line minutes with no PP time. It's completely reasonable to say he's a ppg player in the playoffs.Actually it's you who's completely wrong
Marner is exactly a PPG player in the playoffs and Marchessault is 0.81 PPG in the playoffs.
Looking forward to you not replying to this LMAO
Oh I see.21 points in 20 games is way more impressive than 9 in 7. The answer to the poll is Marner regardless.
This was already brought up. If it's only the most recent playoffs we're using, Marner still has a better PPG. Your other friend just moved the goalposts when I rebuted this.IPS at it again, cherry picking stats to pump up his beloved leaf player. In the 2015 and 2016 playoffs Marchessaualt was getting 4th line minutes with no PP time. It's completely reasonable to say he's a ppg player in the playoffs.
Your the one who probably won't reply to this.
Oh so we're only going by the most recent playoffs then?
Marner still had a better PPG. Keep digging yourself further it's getting hilarious.
Learn to read for the sake of context. Ford said that March didn’t have a PPG in the playoffs. I pointed out he did.
March also played more than 7 games in the playoffs. You think Marner would keep that sample size up? Well, we’d have to get the Leafs to actually win a series to find out.
I like how you completely avoided the 13 game career sample size. LMAO.
How about using a sample size for Marner that is closer to Marchessualt these playoffs? Marner has 13 points in the 13 playoff games he's played. Marchessault has 21 in 20 in the only playoff games he's played as a top 6 forward with PP time.This was already brought up. If it's only the most recent playoffs we're using, Marner still has a better PPG. Your other friend just moved the goalposts when I rebuted this.
He was 100% correct that March did not have a PPG in the playoffs. You decided to move the goalposts and only count the most recent playoffs instead of admitting your mistake.
Perhaps it's you who needs to learn to read for the sake of context?
Nice straw man.Oh I see.
Small sample sizes in the playoffs are only useful when Matthews is called a playoff choker.
Marchessault. Just because Marner plays for Toronto doesn't mean he's as good as their legion of fans says he is. Marchessault is better and more clutch and I would take him on my team first as he would also likely be cheaper.