Jonathan Blum

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by RipCityPuckers, Jun 21, 2007.

View Users: View Users
  1. RipCityPuckers

    RipCityPuckers Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,505
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    Toronto
    I really like him. Anyone else think hes being underrated?
     
  2. Team_Spirit

    Team_Spirit #FireBergevin

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Messages:
    29,039
    Likes Received:
    579
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    I don't think he's underrated, scouts are well aware of his soft hands and mobility. Surefire 1st rounder.
     
  3. Adam91

    Adam91 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,024
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    Equity Analyst
    Location:
    Toronto
    Overrated if you ask me.
     
  4. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    Blum is a perfect example of why I never quit on a guy or get harded headed about a prospect. I didn't like him at all early in the season and ranked him as a third rounder. By the end of the season he won me over and now I have him in my top 10.
     
  5. monster_bertuzzi

    monster_bertuzzi registered user

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    32,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Home Page:
    If he was 25 pounds heavier he would be pushing top 10.
     
  6. MS

    MS 1%er

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    25,665
    Likes Received:
    6,006
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    That's about my take as well.

    Really smart player, but underwhelming physical tools and limited upside. Mobile but not a dynamic skater, small and thinly built, weak point shot, little to no physical game. Probable upside is to be a Nathan Paetsch/Lukas Krajicek-type guy in pro - good intelligent #4-5 puckmoving defender who picks up 25-30 points/year and plays the 2nd PP unit ... useful supplemental player but not a core guy. Is that really the sort of player you want to spend a top-20 pick on?

    I like him, would take him in my organization anyday, but the upside just isn't there to justify taking him higher than the 28-35 range IMO. Really nice pick in the 2nd round, but seeing him rated mid-first in a fair few places raises my eyebrows more than a little bit.
     
  7. Rabid Ranger

    Rabid Ranger 2 is better than one

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,990
    Likes Received:
    782
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Occupation:
    Contract manager
    Location:
    Murica
    I see where you're coming from, but if a team could get a defenseman who could play in the top 4/5 and pick up 30 points a year, they would gladly spend a top 15-20pick in a weak draft.
     
  8. Speedshank

    Speedshank Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton
    I'm more in favor of picking players who don't have the big pounds. If the player can compete and excel in the juniors with little size, than he has a better chance to compete in NHL when he fills out.

    Too often I see big players who are able push their weight around in the juniors but become a bust because the can't continue to dominate against men who are just as big or better.

    I'll take 6 foot 3 180 ibs over 6 foot 3 215 ibs anyday.

    If Blum is able to fill out over the next few years than he's a keeper.

    Petricki has been dominating the USHL against boys smaller than him. He's not going to be able to continue his style in the NHL.
     
  9. Stajan Fan

    Stajan Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Daysland, Alberta
    Home Page:
    That's a hell of a lot weight for a 17 year old kid to put on.
     
  10. WesternCollegeHockey

    WesternCollegeHockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    74
    Do you realize who plays in the USHL? Petrecki is probably below the median age in that league.
     
  11. MS

    MS 1%er

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    25,665
    Likes Received:
    6,006
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    If you wanted a Krajicek/Paetsch on your roster, you could do it tomorrow for a fair bit less than a top-20 pick. Why would it be a good idea to invest a top-20 pick in a player who has a 50% chance of being that good 5 years from now?

    A good scouting staff won't spend picks on players where the value of the pick is higher than the maximum upside of the player down the road. Same with another Giant, Spencer Machacek. Odds are very high he'll be an effective 20-25 point checking forward, and he'd be a nice player to add to an organization, but there's no way in hell he'll ever justify a #1 pick.

    If you invest a high pick in a player with solid top-6/top-4 upside and the player tops out as a useful supplemental player, that's fine. But to not even give yourself a chance of picking up an impact player high in the draft is to me very poor scouting and pick management.
     
  12. monster_bertuzzi

    monster_bertuzzi registered user

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    32,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Home Page:
    He turned 18 half a year ago. For his height (6'1'') he should really be at least 180. 160 is just embarresing and he may slip because of it.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"