SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 13,220
- 11,250
Picks or bodies?I'd consider it if Edmonton added something worthwhile.
We have plenty of NHL bodies, so I guess I’d take a pick or picks. Ceci could maybe be useful if we strike out on all the top RHD UFAs, but he wouldn’t bridge the gap in value between Gibson and Campbell. I’d push for a 2025 1st, but if that’s not an option then maybe a 2nd + Bourgault.Picks or bodies?
Ceci Kulak Kane the rights to Foegele
Prospects: Xavier Bourgault was our 1st round pick a couple years ago
At 50% caphit, Gibson still have no value. Duck are better off just seeing that contract through during this rebuild.Lukas Dostal has shown that he's capable of at least being a 1B goalie who can take 30-40 starts in a season. This leaves Gibson as a trade candidate to a team that could use a starting goalie. Of course, Gibson has negative value at his full cap hit, but with retention, he would look much more attractive to other teams. Ideally, the Ducks would retain $1-2M, but if it nets the Ducks a quality asset, I would absolutely be willing to go to 50% retention ($3.2M for 3 more years). Gibson does have a 10 team no trade list, however, at this point I believe he would waive to go to just about any team that has a chance at the playoffs. The Ducks should be willing to take back a bad contract in a deal for Gibson, so long as the length of that contract is not longer than Gibson's (3 more years).
I do genuinely believe that Gibson can still be a top 10-15 starting goalie in this league. He just seems checked out with the Ducks at this point, and to be honest, it's hard to blame him. If he joined a more competitive team, I'm sure we would see what he's actually capable of. I totally understand the risk involved with acquiring Gibson, which is why I would be willing to retain so much money and to take back a bad contract.
Would Detroit be interested in Husso+ for Gibson with retention? Would New Jersey be interested if they miss out on Markstrom? Could the Kings squeeze him in with significant retention? Maybe an Elvis for Gibson swap? What other possibilities are out there, or are there any?
I’m sure there are a number of teams who would agree with that, but I highly doubt every team would agree. There are absolutely teams that would sign Gibson to a 3 year deal with a $3.2M AAV if he were a free agent right now. If Korpisalo got that contract last offseason then anything is possible.At 50% caphit, Gibson still have no value. Duck are better off just seeing that contract through during this rebuild.
Anything is possible, but getting the equivalence of a 2nd round pick for 50% retention is highly unlikely for Gibson at this stage. Ducks should not be paying to dump players given their rebuild status. They should just play his contract out as of now.I’m sure there are a number of teams who would agree with that, but I highly doubt every team would agree. There are absolutely teams that would sign Gibson to a 3 year deal with a $3.2M AAV if he were a free agent right now. If Korpisalo got that contract last offseason then anything is possible.
I thinj 2nd + Borg + Campbell would do it for us.We have plenty of NHL bodies, so I guess I’d take a pick or picks. Ceci could maybe be useful if we strike out on all the top RHD UFAs, but he wouldn’t bridge the gap in value between Gibson and Campbell. I’d push for a 2025 1st, but if that’s not an option then maybe a 2nd + Bourgault.
Their contracts are same length.I thinj 2nd + Borg + Campbell would do it for us.
You guys get a reclaimation project whos currently the best goalie in the AHL.
We get the higher AAV reclaimation goalie for shorter term (shorter buyout length).
I thinj 2nd + Borg + Campbell would do it for us.
You guys get a reclaimation project whos currently the best goalie in the AHL.
We definitely want a goalie back. Ideally it would be someone like Husso or Georgiev who don’t have much term left, but we aren’t ready to let Clang or Suchanek play regular NHL games.I doubt they want a goalie back, the netminding pipeline is already very good. The main reason to dump Gibson now would be to clear the path for guys like Suchanek, Clara, Clang, etc, not to just plug it up with a different guy who also makes too much money for his performance.
We definitely want a goalie back. Ideally it would be someone like Husso or Georgiev who don’t have much term left, but we aren’t ready to let Clang or Suchanek play regular NHL games.
All that you say is largely correct. The question, however, is whether he has lost it or is just tired of playing for a terrible team. If teams think the former then he's going nowhere; if teams think the latter then there could be a taker or two. As fans, we just don't know enough to make definitive statements about why his numbers are so bad or whether he'll rebound with another team.I think he sucks and have been saying it for years, which only just two offseasons ago was very sacrilege to say in here when in the presence of some people. I think he came in the top-10 that year on the goalie rankings polls we do on this forum. Last year I think he was down to 14th or 15th. Maybe this year will have bumped him down to 22nd or even 25th.
The thing I notice with him is yes, the Ducks are a VERY bad team. They sure are. No argument from me.
What I've noticed from him is the Ducks are bad enough that they should probably be giving up 4 goals most games, with just an average goalie, but in the games that should be 4 goals against, Gibson lets in a couple of questionable goals and it turns the game into a 6 goal against blowout instead of just 4.
The other night he was putrid. Even the goals that didn't look bad, he just totally looked lost. Flopping. If he hadn't been posting poor numbers this many years I would say he's just given up and sick and tired of being on one of the worst teams in the league. There's been several games fairly recently where I would have thought it was Chrona from the Sharks if I didn't know any better.
At the very least, I wouldn't expect anyone to give up much value for him if he were to go somewhere else.All that you say is largely correct. The question, however, is whether he has lost it or is just tired of playing for a terrible team. If teams think the former then he's going nowhere; if teams think the latter then there could be a taker or two. As fans, we just don't know enough to make definitive statements about why his numbers are so bad or whether he'll rebound with another team.
Tired of playing for a terrible team?All that you say is largely correct. The question, however, is whether he has lost it or is just tired of playing for a terrible team. If teams think the former then he's going nowhere; if teams think the latter then there could be a taker or two. As fans, we just don't know enough to make definitive statements about why his numbers are so bad or whether he'll rebound with another team.
I wouldn't either but that is a different argument from the one you were making.At the very least, I wouldn't expect anyone to give up much value for him if he were to go somewhere else.
Both.Tired of playing for a terrible team?
I think what you meant to say is, lowered save percentage because he plays for a terrible team.
At 50% retained and a change of scenery he should be a useful 1B.Guy is cooked. More power to the Ducks if they can find a taker for his awful contract.
What do you expect a 1B goalie with a 3.25M caphit to net in return? Its still an awful contract.At 50% retained and a change of scenery he should be a useful 1B.