Joe Thornton gets new knees for 2018-19. Thinks he'll contribute a lot alongside Kane

Status
Not open for further replies.

MacDonald4MVP

Registered User
May 7, 2016
9,997
5,338
Henrik Sedin got 50 this year and he is much less gifted in terms of physical tools. Thornton should still be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HanSolo

Mikeshane

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
6,175
3,923
Yeah, him being on the ice for 1 OT goal against (that a lack of footspeed had nothing to do with) is pretty indicative he is done as an NHL player. Never mind he was a + player in OT on the season. Funny stuff indeed...

I don't usually derive skating speed from plus/minus.
 

WTFetus

Marlov
Mar 12, 2009
17,904
3,558
San Francisco
I don't usually derive skating speed from plus/minus.

You should've used a different argument than sudden death 3-on-3 then, considering it's of the few instances where +/- is actually fairly indicative. Unless you think scoring more goals than allowing in OT is laughable.
You honestly could have used a number of other scenarios to criticize his speed, but you used one of the worst ones.
 

BeastoftheEast85

Registered User
Dec 31, 2010
2,761
433
New Jersey
Have to give Credit where credit is due. Thornton is one of the best scorers of modern hockey. He has put up about as many points has post lockout as Crosby and still put up over 450 points pre lockout . If he can keep it up for 3 or 4 more seasons and put up 170 or so points could end up top 10 all time for scoring and top 4 for era adjusted scoring. He would already be just about there if not for the 1.5 lockouts he’s been though.
 

Mikeshane

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
6,175
3,923
You should've used a different argument than sudden death 3-on-3 then, considering it's of the few instances where +/- is actually fairly indicative. Unless you think scoring more goals than allowing in OT is laughable.
You honestly could have used a number of other scenarios to criticize his speed, but you used one of the worst ones.

What I said was fine, I laughed at Thornton last year and I'll do it again this year. I don't need any stats to help me figure out that Thornton is very slow.
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,567
3,939
What I said was fine, I laughed at Thornton last year and I'll do it again this year. I don't need any stats to help me figure out that Thornton is very slow.

And we will laugh at the guy who seems willing to suggest OT wins isn't a meaningful stat in order to win an argument on the internet.
 

Tage2Tuch

Because TheJackAttack is in Black
May 10, 2004
9,048
2,658
CAN
I trust Kane, Hertl, Burns, Couture, Vlasic and Jones more than I trust Abdelkader, Helm, Nielsen, Glendening, Dekeyser and Bernier.


I think people just think San Jose is an aging team because they’ve been good for so long and we’re always thought of as Thornton and marrleau despite not having either most of last year lol.

I think the sharks got a lot of good kids and perhaps the most underrated back end in the league counting jones and dell.

Even the coach seems great.

I’m just not sold on Kane. He looked great at the beginning with Bufffalo too but once he got taken off the top line he went from 16 goals 36 points in 39 games to a 19 game scoreless drought playing with ROR on Line two and only got 3 goals and 3 assists , a total of 6 points in the next 21 games.

I figured a honeymoon period would come right when went to SJ and it did.

As long as he plays with a great to elite Center (which you have a couple of, and he’s motivated he should always score around 30. But living that close to Vegas and in Cali and just knowing his lifestyle (and the fact he got his big long contract no less) the great management in San Jose that is known to turn players around needs to keep an eye on him.

I would be stunned. Absolutely stunned if he hit 40. Even on the Sharks. He’s not consistent enough IMO.
 

Rhaegar Targaryen

Registered User
Jun 25, 2016
6,375
4,203
The **** are you even talking about? he scored 82 points in his last full season.

I counted 79 games as his last full season.

We can go back two full years to keep pretending Joe is still a good player, though. The fall will just be that much bigger
 

izzy

go
Apr 29, 2012
86,789
18,762
Nova Scotia
Hertl has never scored 50 points. Kane is basically a 40-50 point guy these days.

Couture has peaked and while he's good, he'll probably start a slow decline in the next couple of seasons.

I guess there is plenty of time to draft/develop someone to replace Couture, but the last Couture level player the Sharks drafted and developed was Couture himself who they drafted in 2007. That's over ten years ago, so drafting a Couture level player is easier said than done.

And a team with Couture/Kane/Hertl as it's three best forwards isn't a perennial playoff team.

i tried 2 tell you buddy
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
i tried 2 tell you buddy

2 photos taken moments before disaster:

D868-F4-B2-3-B6-B-4966-BF9-A-F898-F6-F74-F08.jpg


08-C83-AC2-9840-4033-933-A-D941-D588509-D.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Insignia and izzy

Mulletman

Registered User
Feb 23, 2013
3,990
3,775
Looks like things didn't go like Thornton had planned. A few missed games and the Sharks paid him back by reducing both his icetime and his powerplay role. No more playing with Kane, instead he's stuck in the bottom 6 with a talentless vanilla midget like Kevin LaBanc... :(
 

Honour Over Glory

Fire Sully
Jan 30, 2012
77,316
42,447
Looks like things didn't go like Thornton had planned. A few missed games and the Sharks paid him back by reducing both his icetime and his powerplay role. No more playing with Kane, instead he's stuck in the bottom 6 with a talentless vanilla midget like Kevin LaBanc... :(
The guy that had a hattrick 2 days ago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Insignia

Mulletman

Registered User
Feb 23, 2013
3,990
3,775
The guy that had a hattrick 2 days ago?
Yeah, but that was Thornton carrying him as well. Thornton should be in the top 6 with more icetime, it's as simple as that. Thornton still has that Point per game hockey player in him, it's just the Sharks holding him back...

And with the Sharks slowplaying Karlsson too and keeping him out of the lineup, the Sharks scoring is falling apart. Mulletman predicted 5 80 Point scorers or 7 70 Point scorers (if the scoring is more spread out) for the Sharks before the season started, but because the Sharks and their alternative motives it's all falling apart... :(
 

avsfan09

Registered User
Dec 17, 2010
7,089
3,262
Nova Scotia
Yeah, but that was Thornton carrying him as well. Thornton should be in the top 6 with more icetime, it's as simple as that. Thornton still has that Point per game hockey player in him, it's just the Sharks holding him back...

And with the Sharks slowplaying Karlsson too and keeping him out of the lineup, the Sharks scoring is falling apart. Mulletman predicted 5 80 Point scorers or 7 70 Point scorers (if the scoring is more spread out) for the Sharks before the season started, but because the Sharks and their alternative motives it's all falling apart... :(
What possible motives would they have to hold back their own players and team?
 

Mulletman

Registered User
Feb 23, 2013
3,990
3,775
What possible motives would they have to hold back their own players and team?
Simple. Karlsson plays less games, he'll score less Points and the Sharks can then sign him on a long term deal for cheaper. But if Karlsson had ended up with a career high in Points this season, the Sharks would most likely have had to pay him another million or two on top of what they'll end up paying him on his next deal now.

With Thornton it gives the Sharks an easy out to not sign him next year. It's clear that the Sharks don't want to hold on to Thornton until he truly declines. The Sharks are looking to avoid what Anaheim did with Selanne and are looking to copy what Calgary did with Iginla instead. If Thornton ends up with 40-45 Points this year, which he most likely will, no Sharks fan will be upset if he's not re-signed.
 

Kcoyote3

Half-wall Hockey - link below!
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2012
12,622
11,207
www.half-wallhockey.com
Simple. Karlsson plays less games, he'll score less Points and the Sharks can then sign him on a long term deal for cheaper. But if Karlsson had ended up with a career high in Points this season, the Sharks would most likely have had to pay him another million or two on top of what they'll end up paying him on his next deal now.

With Thornton it gives the Sharks an easy out to not sign him next year. It's clear that the Sharks don't want to hold on to Thornton until he truly declines. The Sharks are looking to avoid what Anaheim did with Selanne and are looking to copy what Calgary did with Iginla instead. If Thornton ends up with 40-45 Points this year, which he most likely will, no Sharks fan will be upset if he's not re-signed.


Your world makes no sense
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad