Joe Sakic - Redeemed as an NHL GM?

Avs71

Registered User
Aug 12, 2008
8,958
4,415
People saying it is just Sakic benefiting from MacKinnon developing, think Sakic may have had something to do with developing MacKinnon?

Today, Sakic maintains an open-door policy with MacKinnon, welcoming suggestions on everything from roster construction to breakfast menus. They also golf several times a year; Sakic is around a one handicap, according to MacKinnon. “Barely even talk about hockey,” he says. “I respond to that better than a hardass. I know where he stands. I’m not wondering what Joe is thinking.” Known for his even keel on the ice, Sakic has also helped smooth out MacKinnon’s rough edges—mostly body language that could fluster teammates when MacKinnon grew frustrated. “A good calming influence on him,” Barrie says.

Nathan MacKinnon is ready to deliver
 

Critical13

Fear is the mind-killer.
Feb 25, 2017
12,617
9,435
Sitting at a desk.
Sakic continues to get no respect for his work. He's been fantastic as a gm.

Sakic has been good but he inherited the 2nd best player in the NHL on a sweetheart salary.

The true test will be seeing how he handles some upcoming contracts. He's got Wilson, Kerfoot, Rantanen, Kamenev, Andrighetto, Zadarov and Varlarmov all needing new deals next year.

Some of those deals will be tricky. Someone like Rantanen looks like a 10 million dollar player right now, and Zadarov will be looking in the 5-6 range.

Also curious how some of his drafts start to pan out. Makar is such a huge wildcard but there are other interesting prospects in that org. Then they have Ott's pick as well, which could be franchise changing.

I think there's a good chance he comes out with a top 5 team in a few years, but I don't think he's done enough yet to really earn being called a fantastic GM, unless you are using fantastic loosely.
 

nightonthesun

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
1,738
1,943
New Jersey
Mackinnons contract was business as usual. It was signed before he demonstrated who he truly is as a player. When assessing Sakic I think it’s moot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CB Joe

Drury_Sakic

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
4,921
801
www.avalanchedb.com
Only real complaint, and it is a big one honestly, this season is that he was too stupid to figure out that the team should have signed a 4th line/depth player who was solid on face-offs.... The Avs are laughably bad on face-offs. Would have been an easy fix to a problem that should have been seen from miles away.

Should have been addressed, they were terribly bad last year and are just as bad this year. Could still probably be addressed with a trade or maybe even a vet UFA signing still.
 

hooverdam

Registered User
Feb 21, 2013
2,499
1,748
Only real complaint, and it is a big one honestly, this season is that he was too stupid to figure out that the team should have signed a 4th line/depth player who was solid on face-offs.... The Avs are laughably bad on face-offs. Would have been an easy fix to a problem that should have been seen from miles away.

Should have been addressed, they were terribly bad last year and are just as bad this year. Could still probably be addressed with a trade or maybe even a vet UFA signing still.

The Avs were the best team in the league at faceoffs in 16-17. That worked out well for them.

If a team has to be bad at something, I'd sure as shit rather it be faceoffs than anything else. They're inconsequential if you're a team that can establish a good forecheck, lead the way in takeaways, and transiition the puck well: all things the Avs are really good at under Bednar. It's not a concern.
 

VictoriaJetsFan

Registered User
Mar 24, 2013
4,169
2,112
I never thought Sakic really deserved the criticism he received and I was right, he has built an excellent young team with more huge talent coming given the Ottawa draft pick.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,138
25,285
Sakic has been good but he inherited the 2nd best player in the NHL on a sweetheart salary.

The true test will be seeing how he handles some upcoming contracts. He's got Wilson, Kerfoot, Rantanen, Kamenev, Andrighetto, Zadarov and Varlarmov all needing new deals next year.

Some of those deals will be tricky. Someone like Rantanen looks like a 10 million dollar player right now, and Zadarov will be looking in the 5-6 range.

Also curious how some of his drafts start to pan out. Makar is such a huge wildcard but there are other interesting prospects in that org. Then they have Ott's pick as well, which could be franchise changing.

I think there's a good chance he comes out with a top 5 team in a few years, but I don't think he's done enough yet to really earn being called a fantastic GM, unless you are using fantastic loosely.

Sakic and Bednar really deserve a lot of the credit for grooming Mack into the player he is today.

Zadorov will sign at most in the 4 range. He hasn't shown enough offensively to get 5-6.
 

Allan92

Registered User
Jan 2, 2016
2,369
1,902
Meath
A year ago I felt bad for Sakic, I wasn't shitting all over him or anything but I thought it was sad that his legacy was becoming tarnished with the franchise.

Safe to say he took my pity and shipped it off on his way to the playoffs.

He's shut a lot of people up and his team building skill is really beginning to look special
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arcana

Lonewolfe2015

Rom Com Male Lead
Sponsor
Dec 2, 2007
17,268
2,214
A GM is not a good GM due to 1 good trade. I guess you can give credit to him to not sign the guys he let go, but they are all pretty bad players that he likely signed himself!

How many GMs out there actually let go all the dead weight on their rosters? Most seem to keep one or more players around as pets.

Furthermore, Sakic has made very shrewd moves since he inherited negotiating from Roy leaving. Signing Kerfoot, Calvert, Cole, Francouz and Bernier. Then trading Duchene for a haul, acquiring Grubauer cheap and not making any panic trades resulting in culture changes like moving Landeskog.

The Avs have the best prospect pool they've ever had. Makar, Kaut, Bowers, Timmins, Kamenev, Greer, etc.

Sakic may not be Stevie Y as a GM. But he's doing it his own way and so far so good.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,249
79,226
Redmond, WA
Sakic redeemed himself a lot with the Duchene trade, a lot of people thought Sakic was being stupid for holding on to Duchene for so long and wasn't going to get what he wanted. Then he got a crazy good haul for Duchene, and that's with ignoring that Ottawa's 1st is likely going to be very high.

I still don't think he's that great of a GM, I think people here overreact to single season results and make absurd proclamations based on them. Dorion went from an amazing GM to a terrible GM because of 1 season on here. He's not like Chiarelli bad, who has been making mostly bad moves for years now, but I still have him below average.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,138
25,285
Sakic redeemed himself a lot with the Duchene trade, a lot of people thought Sakic was being stupid for holding on to Duchene for so long and wasn't going to get what he wanted. Then he got a crazy good haul for Duchene, and that's with ignoring that Ottawa's 1st is likely going to be very high.

I still don't think he's that great of a GM, I think people here overreact to single season results and make absurd proclamations based on them. Dorion went from an amazing GM to a terrible GM because of 1 season on here. He's not like Chiarelli bad, who has been making mostly bad moves for years now, but I still have him below average.

I think what were seeing is Sakic growing as a GM and learning from all those rookie mistakes he and Roy made early on. He's done well on almost all of his trades bar the trades for Berra and Stuart. He's done well on contracts the last few seasons bar the Cole and Colborne signings and set the team up insanely well for the future. I definitely think he deserved some flack early on in his reign as GM, but you can really see he's learned how to be an effective GM in this league and is doing good things now.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,677
17,051
Mulberry Street
The Duchene trade, RoR trade, signing Mackinnon to 6.3 per year alone gets him out of the bottom 10. Easily

AT the time tho the MackInnon deal wasn't anything special, he had yet to surpass his career high of 63 points.

Now it looks great, but hindsight is everything.

Looks like he was just a guy who needed the keys to the team in order to breakout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StayPuft39

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,298
19,196
w/ Renly's Peach
AT the time tho the MackInnon deal wasn't anything special, he had yet to surpass his career high of 63 points.

Now it looks great, but hindsight is everything.

Looks like he was just a guy who needed the keys to the team in order to breakout.

Looks like that, and it certainly was a big factor in his breakout...but there was a lot of progress that lead him to that point. As I doubt we'd have seen the same explosion from if he had been given the keys right after his rookie year, ya know? But in year 3 he flashed this level out of the gates before his injury, even if his wrist/hand and lesser supporting cast, ultimately prevented him from exceeding those rookie year totals. And in year 4 he was already carrying the team...it was just an extraordinarily shitty team.

So it's not entirely hindsight, as the progress was there to see. That's why -- despite a camp on our board which was hyper-critical of MacK to bolster the case for Mikko to eventually surpass him as our franchise player -- in main board threads about how MacK peaked as a rookie, most avs fans either vehemently disagreed or turned to ferocious sarcasm...like our hero, NEB.

So it's not like Joe just gave him a contract for no reason and got lucky that it turned out to be a good idea.
 

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
52,538
16,566
South Rectangle
Looks like that, and it certainly was a big factor in his breakout...but there was a lot of progress that lead him to that point. As I doubt we'd have seen the same explosion from if he had been given the keys right after his rookie year, ya know? But in year 3 he flashed this level out of the gates before his injury, even if his wrist/hand and lesser supporting cast, ultimately prevented him from exceeding those rookie year totals. And in year 4 he was already carrying the team...it was just an extraordinarily ****ty team.

So it's not entirely hindsight, as the progress was there to see. That's why -- despite a camp on our board which was hyper-critical of MacK to bolster the case for Mikko to eventually surpass him as our franchise player -- in main board threads about how MacK peaked as a rookie, most avs fans either vehemently disagreed or turned to ferocious sarcasm...like our hero, NEB.

So it's not like Joe just gave him a contract for no reason and got lucky that it turned out to be a good idea.
Probably also helped that the Duchene trade stopped trying to split the four best forwards between 2 lines and made the Avs put all their eggs in one basket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgf

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad