Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,267
- 31,334
They are still trading for third goaltenders.
It’s not just Sakic vs. Roy but there’s also the factor of the old school Quebec guys like Brad Smith’s influence as the head pro scout (let’s just call him what he really is director of player personnel) and then Billington’s influence as the GM of the AHL his priority is to win there so that also colors decisions.
Sakic has been able to stick to a more unified vision since Roy’s departure. I think they had similar ideas but a lot different thoughts on executing them.
Speaking of, Sakic was fairly candid in this interview covering pretty much all parts of his career and he does go into the differences with Roy a bit.
These quotes below stand out to me. This kind of confirms my theory as to why Roy left as well.
He wanted Joe to make certain moves to make the team better (primarily with the defense) but Joe was still dragging his feet a little. The moves he did make with ROR for Z and Compher etc, made them younger and pushed their competitive window further back.
When Sakic made more stop gap moves by adding Wiercioch, Colborne, and Tyutin the next off season instead of more significant moves to improve the team, it was obvious they were gonna suck again, and Roy probably would have been let go after another losing season.
So as a Hall of Famer and arguably the best goaltender of all time, he decided to step down on his own terms, rather than be embarrassed by another losing season, when he didn't have any control over improving the team.
"We might not have agreed on everything personnel-wise, but I kind of felt at that point we needed a rebuild."
"That year he retired, we knew we weren't going to be very good and we had to start to try and rebuild, from my point of view."