Joe Sakic or Sergei Fedorov?

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Puckgenius*, Apr 10, 2011.

View Users: View Users
  1. Puckgenius*

    Puckgenius* Guest

    Who was better in their prime? Sakic for me but its close.
     
  2. Epsilon

    Epsilon #basta

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    48,464
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    South Cackalacky
    Fedorov had the better absolute peak (as in one single season), but Sakic's prime was longer and more consistently combined great regular seasons and playoffs (whereas a lot of Fedorov's best playoff years came with good but not amazing regular seasons). So it depends on how you interpret the question but I'd lean towards Sakic.
     
  3. HockeyThoughts

    HockeyThoughts Delivering The Truth

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    12,394
    Likes Received:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Mississauga
    Joe Sakic in a landslide. Fedorov was really only played to a level comparable to Sakic's through 1990/91-1997/98, a span of 8 seasons. Joe Sakic didn't understand the meaning of a "downseason", he played consistently amazing through all of his 20 seasons in the NHL.
     
  4. RabbinsDuck

    RabbinsDuck Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Location:
    Brighton, MI
    Agreed - at his absolute best there are few better than Fedorov, but Sakic quickly overtakes him with years of superior results.
     
  5. Jepprey

    Jepprey Creeper

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,617
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    124
    I'll take Sakic 8/10 times over Fedorov.
     
  6. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,234
    Likes Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    229
    Fedorov only has a couple years (1994, 1996) where he'd have been thought of as a top 10 player. His best season is 1994 while Sakic's is 2001. Having seen both I take Sakic's for sure. Not to mention Sakic maintained his prime for a huge chunk of his career while Fedorov later became a player who was so-so in the regular season but someone you could count on in the postseason. Sakic was great on both counts.
     
  7. DisgruntledGoat*

    DisgruntledGoat* Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,301
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joe Sakic for me, and its a pretty easy decision. Sakic was a far more consistent high-level performer. Everything that Federov is praised for, two-way play and playoff scoring, Sakic could do, too, plus more.

    Not to get this off-topic, but there are a few late-90s stars that I feel get significantly overrated on HFBoards, and Federov is one of them.
     
  8. revolverjgw

    revolverjgw Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2003
    Messages:
    8,483
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Sakic in a walk. Fedorov was better for about 10 minutes
     
  9. Blades of Glory

    Blades of Glory Troll Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Investment banker
    Location:
    California
    Sakic obviously wins this because his career is simply overwhelming. But at the same time, Fedorov is one of the few players whose playoff career can stack up legitimately with that of Sakic. I don't think people give Fedorov enough credit for just how dominant he was in the playoffs. If he had not played under Scotty Bowman, I would wager that his playoff numbers would be equal to those of Sakic and/or Forsberg. Bowman trusted Fedorov like few other players he ever coached.


    That's what I said about Fedorov in a Datsyuk vs. Fedorov thread a few days ago. He may not be Sakic, but he was Detroit's go-to guy for many years. Bowman considered Fedorov so vital to the Wings that he rewarded him for playing the Bowman way. The deal for Fetisov, one of Fedorov's idols, was one of those rewards. According to Bowman, Fedorov almost jumped through the roof of the team plane when he told him about it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2011
  10. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,300
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    Agree with everything you say, BOG. Sakic wins this because his prime was so much longer, not because he peaked higher.
     
  11. Hardyvan123

    Hardyvan123 [email protected]

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    17,552
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Fully agree with BOG and Devil here, Sakic's longevity trumps Fedorov here.
     
  12. IggyFan12

    IggyFan12 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sakic for me. Few people could match Sakic's 2000-2002 brief run as the best player in the world. Winning the Hart Trophy and Olympic MVP and an argument could have been made for the Con Smyth. Federov was good, Sakic was great. Plus his 1996 Playoffs is one of the greatest playoffs in the history of the NHL. 18 goals 3rd highest total ever.
     
  13. Merya

    Merya Jokerit & Finland; anti-theist

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,904
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Psychosocialstudies
    Location:
    Helsinki
    Sakic, because he has one of the longest primes that I can recall. Fedorov might have the better single year peak tho.
     
  14. IggyFan12

    IggyFan12 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO Sakics 2001 Hart trophy season > Feddys 94 Hart season. Federov had 2 more points but Sakic led his team to the Cup as well.
     
  15. Hasbro

    Hasbro Can He Skate?! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    39,090
    Likes Received:
    1,502
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Drone
    Location:
    South Rectangle
    Sakic did it in a lower scoring era too.
     
  16. tony d

    tony d Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    67,939
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Office Worker
    Location:
    Behind A Tree
    Joe Sakic
     
  17. Wings4Life

    Wings4Life Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,681
    Likes Received:
    229
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Ov Steamrolls Jagr!
    Right, but Fedorov's prime ended in 1998 with his holdout.

    In his prime he was scoring at the same pace as Joe (better some years, worse some years) and was far superior in the defensive aspect of the game.

    Thus, Fedorov by a large margin for me.
     
  18. JaymzB

    JaymzB Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,731
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Toronto
    I disagree. While Sakic did get a Cup in his best season, Federov's was quite simply the greatest 2-way season I have ever seen from a player. It is not an exageration that he could do almost everything as good as any other player in the league. Sakic has the better "prime" as it lasted far longer, but Federov in 94 was something else.
     
  19. Ice Crusher

    Ice Crusher Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Quebec City
    Im not well placed of saying this but your choice is pretty damn easy since your a Wings fan ;)
     
  20. IggyFan12

    IggyFan12 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Players since 1980 to Captain a team to a Cup victory and win the Hart Trophy in the same season:

    Wayne Gretzky,
    Mark Messier,
    Joe Sakic
     
  21. arrbez

    arrbez bad chi

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Messages:
    13,286
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Toronto
    I'm on the Sakic side of this debate, but you're getting pretty specific there.

    Players since 5000 BC to win the Hart and Selke in the same year and then at some point nail Anna Kournikova:
    -Sergei Fedorov
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2011
  22. IggyFan12

    IggyFan12 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fair enough. Just wanted to point out how hard it is to be the best player during the season and also win the Stanley Cup. Most Hart Trophy winners don't end up winning a cup that year.
     
  23. arrbez

    arrbez bad chi

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2004
    Messages:
    13,286
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Toronto
    Absolutely true, no doubt. This seems to go for teams as well as players. So often a team doesn't win the Cup after their best regular season.

    And the Wings did somehow manage to lose to the Sharks in 1994. I don't remember much of that series, except the surprising result (and then those same Sharks scaring the hell out of my Leafs the next round). Fedorov led that series in scoring, although I couldn't comment on how he actually played. An injured Yzerman and a rookie goalie probably didn't help their cause. Looking over the box scores, Irbe had surprisingly poor stats during that series for the Sharks, outside of game 7. I always figured he must have stolen that series. Huh. On the other hand, Osgood's 14 save performance in game 7 isn't too inspiring either. Detroit outscored San Jose 27-21 in that series and lost. The Wings were still in full playoff choke mode at that point. Looking back now, I wish I would have watched more.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2011
  24. vadim sharifijanov

    vadim sharifijanov ugh

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    17,048
    Likes Received:
    1,476
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Home Page:
    it's hard not to be impressed with fedorov's peak, especially his physical skills. his skating ability, his slapshot, his incredible two-way play, he had all the tools and one hell of a toolbox.

    but sakic, while less flashy-- but still a very exciting player to watch-- had that out of this world wrist shot, great playmaker, amazing vision, and a very good two-way game of his own. the consistency and how he always gave 100% puts him over the top.

    peak vs. peak, joe was more understated but the results speak for themselves: hart trophy, stanley cup, olympic gold, olympic MVP, 2nd in goals and points, 1st in playoff goals and points. i don't think i'll ever see a year quite like fedorov in '94, but sakic in '01 was at least as good.
     
  25. Blades of Glory

    Blades of Glory Troll Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    18,401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Investment banker
    Location:
    California
    I think we all agree on the answer to this question. But still, Fedorov was the type of player that may never come around again. He was spectacular in every facet of the game, albeit tailing off in the regular season after the offer sheet in 98.

    Remember this? Game 7. I know it's an aging Wayne, but it's hard to not think about what would have happened if Gretzky had been able to get the puck to Hull, or even just be in a position to make a play (shoot or pass). It's not just about the back-checking, it's the circumstances and the situation. Not only was Fedorov on the other side of the ice after taking the shot, but even when he somehow circled to the puck side, he was also skating back towards Gretzky, who was already headed up ice. When he saw the shot blocked, he stopped and headed the other direction instantly. It's a little ridiculous. The guy began wearing an "A" for Scotty Bowman at age 25. Not just any guy, but a 25 year old Russian. That's how you know he was special. I mean, in 2002, on a team with 7 other HOF skaters (F or D), Fedorov was third on the Wings, behind Lidstrom and Chelios, in in ice time during the playoffs. Sakic is Sakic. But Fedorov stands up to just about every other center from that era.

     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2011

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"