McGarnagle
Yes.
- Aug 5, 2017
- 28,797
- 38,304
It always stuck with me with the first Winter Classic at Fenway and his voice booming over the PA.
It just added to the magic of that day.
I don't know, in every clip I've found of Ric Flair doing the WOO, I don't think it sounds like the After Goal WOO, like, at all. Maybe it's just me, but it sure sounds just like Jim Martin did it and that's the recording they use. (maybe I just WANT it to be big Jim?)It sure does sound like Jim but it is Rick Flair
It is FlairI don't know, in every clip I've found of Ric Flair doing the WOO, I don't think it sounds like the After Goal WOO, like, at all. Maybe it's just me, but it sure sounds just like Jim Martin did it and that's the recording they use. (maybe I just WANT it to be big Jim?)
I saw that article in my searches. I don't think it says one way or the other who is actually WOOing. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter.
It does at the end of the article. I updated my original post.I saw that article in my searches. I don't think it says one way or the other who is actually WOOing. In the grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter.
It simply says "a cut of the Woo." Doesn't say whose cut it is.It does at the end of the article. I updated my original post.
It simply says "a cut of the Woo." Doesn't say whose cut it is.
If you don’t believe that don’t. Everywhere over the years it has been said that is Flair,.It simply says "a cut of the Woo." Doesn't say whose cut it is.
I'm just saying I looked and couldn't find anything. One would think if it had been said everywhere, it would be easier to verify. Not that it's a big deal.If you don’t believe that don’t. Everywhere over the years it has been said that is Flair,.
NESN, Dale Arnold on the radio, etc
Let go man!
Since it's obviously a recording (of whom is yet to be determined ) , I have no issue with the recording staying.Either way it's original to Jim so whoever they replace him with hopefully doesn't try to replicate it!
Ask yourself this.Since it's obviously a recording (of whom is yet to be determined ) , I have no issue with the recording staying.
Easy. Consistency. And for contingencies when Jim might not have made it.Ask yourself this.
Since it has been an audio cut all these years and if it is Jim Martin who is there behind a mic. Why use an audio clip of the man when he is already there behind the mic and let him just do it himself?
Since it's obviously a recording (of whom is yet to be determined ) , I have no issue with the recording staying.
Ask yourself this.
Since it has been an audio cut all these years and if it is Jim Martin who is there behind a mic. Why use an audio clip of the man when he is already there behind the mic and let him just do it himself?
"Ok Jim we are going to pay you to sit behind a mic and announce penalties, 50/50 raffles and the time, scorer of the goal and the assists. ALL except for the word "WOO!" we got that on audio.Maybe he recorded the perfect woo and knew there was no way he could ever do a better one live?
I'm young enough that I don't really even know anyone else. This is going to be sad and really weird.
Great letter - genuine and heartfelt. Good luck to him and congratulations on his retirement.