So that I can understand better, is Vs.X in this application a rate-based metric, or a quantity-based metric? [To clarify- is it based on total points in a season, or points-per-game within each season?]2nd Lines
Malkin > Lindros
Offense basis 7yr Vs.X
Malkin: 93.8 (includes 2017-18)
Toe Blake: 86.3
Lindros: 85.0
Here, I think it's worth asking: is Malkin good enough defensively to handle Lindros?? Lindros spent the prime of his career being the alpha-concern of any team playing against him. Malkin had no such worries- at least, so long as Crosby was healthy.Matchup
Lindros is not good enough defensively to handle Malkin, and at this point Malkin is a much better offensive player. Lindros obviously has a physical edge on Malkin, but Malkin has size, he doesn't use it aggressively to go after people, but he is not easy to push around, and does not get intimidated. Lindros will not be able to impose his will like he could against a smaller and/or softer center.
So that I can understand better, is Vs.X in this application a rate-based metric, or a quantity-based metric? [To clarify- is it based on total points in a season, or points-per-game within each season?]
Here, I think it's worth asking: is Malkin good enough defensively to handle Lindros?? Lindros spent the prime of his career being the alpha-concern of any team playing against him. Malkin had no such worries- at least, so long as Crosby was healthy.
I couldn't begin to imagine regular-season rate-of-production numbers for prime Lindros if he was the second-best center on his team...