- Feb 24, 2012
- 62,708
- 46,698
If there was a state of mind that was the complete and total opposite of "shocked," you posting something like this leaves me like that.
And yet explains so, so much.
If there was a state of mind that was the complete and total opposite of "shocked," you posting something like this leaves me like that.
About time a goalie stole a game.
Habs are better on ice than paper.
Landy is such a complete player , 1 of the best wingers in the league.I actually think Landeskog shouldn't be called the 3rd wheel. That guy is every bit as good and important as the other two. Without him playing his game the other two wouldn't score as much and they would bleed goals against.
No he is not. Landeskog is great and plays his role brilliantly but Mikko and Nate are elite.
In his losses and no decisions, Varlamov allowed the following number of goals: 3, 2, 1, 2, 6, 3, 4, 3, 6, 5, 3, 3. In his losses, he cracked the .910 mark exactly twice against Tampa and Wild. Kind of hard to excuse him for lack of goal support in games he allowed at least 3 goals, and that has happened 12 times this season.
Grub has stilled had more 3+ goals against games than Varly as a percentage of starts. Not sure this Stat is much of a winning argument against Varly.
Love seeing Landy 3rd in goal scoring and 12th in points.
Pretty much. You know what you have in Varlamov. We need to find out what we have in Grubauer.It isn't about a stat to put Gru above Varly, but showing Varly has issues with consistency that we all know about and have known about for years. As an Av, Gru hasn't shown the consistency needed... but given his contract and the trade, he needs to be given a shot to fail before stating that he has the same issue. Very, very possible he has the same if not worse issues... but that needs to be known first. Varly's struggles just give that opportunity.
If he had Milan Hejduk on his flank he would run away with the scoring title. Pool Party I guess was supposed to be that guy but he looks like a baby giraffe straight from the womb.It's not that Mikko isn't talented, but Connor generates so much on a nightly basis that it honestly surprises me how he doesn't average 2 points per game every season.
Do you think it's a good idea to call up a not-NHL ready prospect just for the sake of it, playing him 5-6 min/game and then send him back down frustrated because of the little icetime he got? I don't. Bring him up when he looks ready; but not a minute earlier.They have an ace coach who recognized right away what they can and can't do. They punch everything down the middle because they're so small and fast, they know they can't win board battles and what not. They also used a relentlessly aggressive forecheck.
I'll also give the Avs a LITTLE credit. They didn't yield a ton of ice up the middle, though they were ridiculously conservative in the neutral zone. But that happens when your team is playing with almost zero confidence.
If there's a callup please let it be Meloche. I just know it's gonna be frickin' Alt though.
Do you think it's a good idea to call up a not-NHL ready prospect just for the sake of it, playing him 5-6 min/game and then send him back down frustrated because of the little icetime he got? I don't. Bring him up when he looks ready; but not a minute earlier.
I don't think it would hurt , give him a game or two and see where he is at . Might be some injuries later in the season where we need to call him up. Let him get a feel for what the big show is all about.This isn't a forward we're talking about. It's virtually impossible to play a defender 5 minutes. It's probably 10 minutes if you shelter the living hell out of him.
Are we really convinced he's not ready? I get he's been up and down, in and out of the lineup, but they all have. And from what I've understood he's been one of the more consistent defenders for the Eagles.
I am not at all down with the Detroit method of callups, where they basically have to be dominating the league in all facets before they get a nod from the parent club. Contrary to popular belief, grinding a prospect to bits in the American Hockey League isn't necessarily ideal either. There's nothing wrong with having a look-see and then going from there. Did they wait until they were ABSOLUTELY certain that Tyson Barrie was ready before giving him a good, long stint with the Avs? No. And I recall that Kevin Shattenkirk was actually playing quite poorly in the AHL before he was called up by the Avs and never went back.
I'm not saying it's a given, but I'd rather see the kid get a shot than a vet who hasn't even been cutting it at the AHL level this season.
Let me put it this way: If this team was willing to give extended looks to Andrei frickin' Mironov last season, who was uproariously bad the handful of games he played, then they should give one to Nicolas Meloche.
Incidentally anyone try the live thread thing yet? I can't really participate since my laptop appears to have taken the dirt nap recently.
It's more that what MacKinnon & Rantanen are doing is not sustainable in any capacity whereas McDavid is just chugging along with a normal shooting percentage and on ice shooting percentage doing McDavid stuff.I can't wait until McDavid isn't considered the best bet for the Art Ross. Mack and Rants are doing a great job staying ahead of him.
The closest McDavid has come to the lead in the last while was 7 points back. Currently at 9 points.
McDavid would have to go on a truly epic run to pull it off. I don't think it's likely that Mack and Rantanen both hit huge slumps. Even when one guy isn't having a great game, odds are that the other one will, or Landy will get a goal.
McDavid winning the Art Ross isn't as likely as people think.
My post had nothing to do with that. If Rantanen and MacKinnon don't get injured or forget how to score, there will come a point in the season where it seems highly unlikely that McDavid can catch up. I'm hoping that happens.It's more that what MacKinnon & Rantanen are doing is not sustainable in any capacity whereas McDavid is just chugging along with a normal shooting percentage and on ice shooting percentage doing McDavid stuff.
My post had nothing to do with that. If Rantanen and MacKinnon don't get injured or forget how to score, there will come a point in the season where it seems highly unlikely that McDavid can catch up. I'm hoping that happens.
MacKinnon is playing at an “unsustainable” pace for well over 100 games. Maybe it’s not a hot streak?Yes and my point is responding directly to that by saying that McDavid has a good chance to pass them after they inevitably slow down and he continues playing in the sustainavly productive manner he has so far this year and in his career.
Yes and my point is responding directly to that by saying that McDavid has a good chance to pass them after they inevitably slow down and he continues playing in the sustainavly productive manner he has so far this year and in his career.
MacKinnon is playing at an “unsustainable” pace for well over 100 games. Maybe it’s not a hot streak?
BTW, are you even an Avs fan?
Just look at the numbers dude.Yes and my point is responding directly to that by saying that McDavid has a good chance to pass them after they inevitably slow down and he continues playing in the sustainavly productive manner he has so far this year and in his career.