Smith sure is, add Jared Moe as an intriguing prospect we'll be hearing more about very soon as well. There are some guys that will be on the lower parts of this list that will rise quite a bit by next summer.Going with Spacek. I like his game. I think Stanley isn't too far behind. Green remains a question mark for me after a disappointing D+1 and his long-term injury in D+2. He's a great skater, but has a lot of holes in his game. Nathan Smith is a darkhorse at this stage.
Surprised to see Logan so high in this poll. Did not see any of his play last season has he improved so much to be a possible Jets top 7 or 8 prospect?
Lol, I need posters to tell me who to add next! Or should I just pick out of a hat?Spacek this time. Berdin next.
Add: Some better players please.
Jets prospect pool has become that shallow.
Look at our 5-20 from last year. Lets just say Spacek, Stanley and Comrie take us to the number 10 vote. You still have guys like Berdin, Kovacevic, Green, Gawanke, Suess, Smith etc. We may get thinner at 15-20 but 5-15 is not much different depth wise than last year is it?Fair enough but that is only true because all of their best prospects have made the big club. I suspect that this shallowing of the prospect pool happens to all team that become contenders for the cups. I do not see this as a bad thing because after all is not winning it all the ultimate goal no matter what that does to the prospect pool?
These are by Alex Gable and based on Emmanuel Perry's prospect values (you can play with this yourself here: Tableau Public):
View attachment 130401
So, Stanley and Spacek are pretty close by that model. I wonder if it accounts for Stanley's relatively strong even strength production in D+2.These are by Alex Gable and based on Emmanuel Perry's prospect values (you can play with this yourself here: Tableau Public):
View attachment 130401
I think 2017 refers to 2017-18. The adjusted scoring stats (in the little charts below) are per-game rates, so that would account for fewer games played (but not being rusty).Don't know how his charts are derived but worth noting that Stanley was injured in 2017 and only played 35 games. There would be games he played rusty when he returned from injury would affect the comparison.
I think it's just all-situation points. Stanley has the higher value, but Spacek has a bit better chance of making it to the NHL.So, Stanley and Spacek are pretty close by that model. I wonder if it accounts for Stanley's relatively strong even strength production in D+2.
Stanley's even strength point production is better than his all-situation production, relative to others..I think 2017 refers to 2017-18. The adjusted scoring stats (in the little charts below) are per-game rates, so that would account for fewer games played (but not being rusty).
I think it's just all-situation points. Stanley has the higher value, but Spacek has a bit better chance of making it to the NHL.
Yes, it was a pretty encouraging season from Stanley.Stanley's even strength point production is better than his all-situation production, relative to others..
Surprised to see Logan so high in this poll. Did not see any of his play last season has he improved so much to be a possible Jets top 7 or 8 prospect?
Ironically Stanley’s overall scoring relative to age this season is worse than the previous season.