I hope you're not trying to say something about Winnipeg.... :
haha I live in Saskatchewan. Our wifi is pretty solid here.
I hope you're not trying to say something about Winnipeg.... :
A lot of this will also depend on post-season success. If we win a cup in the next two years, we are ****ed.
Because I find it fun to find other work arounds when someone says that something isn't doable.But all that isn't necessary. The player gets his money and the team gets cap relief under the current CBA rules. Why go looking for exotic solutions when there isn't a problem for either the player or the team? There are dozens of players out there getting paid and not playing due to long term injuries and none of them are retiring before their contracts expire. You might see the odd situation where a Russian player wants to go back to the KHL, but that doesn't really apply to Mason.
Only if you want to maintain the team as is. These pieces will become valuable in 2 cup runs. What a great problem to resolve
Fair enough, but the league and NHLPA has already addressed the issue with rules around LTIR so that players get paid out their guaranteed contracts and teams can use the cap space to remain competitive.Because I find it fun to find other work arounds when someone says that something isn't doable.
lol. 6 pages in, this thread doesn't read like you guys are 'having fun'.
Agreed, but here is the real advantage of signing as many as these young guys to team friendly deals as soon as you can and not just push the can down the road with bridge deals. The more long term cost certainty the better.I'm hoping we run into a boat load of cap issues after a cup or two. Wouldn't want it any other way.
Comrie would have to show a lot more before you can feel comfortable with him as a back up. I think Mason will get the opportunity yet and we will be very happy we have him to pick up some of the load. I wouldn't be rushing him out the door quite yet.
Fair enough, but the league and NHLPA has already addressed the issue with rules around LTIR so that players get paid out their guaranteed contracts and teams can use the cap space to remain competitive.
Right because a Stanley cup champion in a trade gets you a lot of other young guys who can be just as talented. Everyone wants a winner!I'm hoping we run into a boat load of cap issues after a cup or two. Wouldn't want it any other way.
Not saying you don't go out looking for a backup if needed, I just don't see Comrie being that player unless we see a full season of him reaching a whole other level.Maybe, maybe not. Generally one can get a decent backup for a lot less then 5 million though......either internally or externally
I realize that but since we have just had 7 pages discussing are pending cap pressures I took it as a given we would be in a LTIR situation.It doesn't work like that exactly. The players cap hit remain on the books. Teams are only granted cap relief (ability to exceed the ceiling) not extra cap space
Agreed, but here is the real advantage of signing as many as these young guys to team friendly deals as soon as you can and not just push the can down the road with bridge deals. The more long term cost certainty the better.
I realize that but since we have just had 7 pages discussing are pending cap pressures I took it as a given we would be in a LTIR situation.
Which would apply to Mason if he was unable to return to action next season following his concussion. Which was the starting point of the discussion.The distinction means that a team can't get cap relief for ELC bonuses and does not bank cap space during the season to be used at the TD. Relief can only be used to replace the injured player(s) on the roster
Which would apply to Mason if he was unable to return to action next season following his concussion. Which was the starting point of the discussion.
I know but if we are using LTIR then Laine & others ELC bonuses could create a bonus overage penalty for the following season. LTIR is not all it's cracked up to be.
Its ok if you have a team of veteran players and you want to bring someone else in. But you are correct in that it wont be great for us. How is it working for Toronto with all of their LTIR players?
Yeah I think best bet is we trade Mason and keep Hutch/Comrie as a backup or let him walk when his contract is up. If we trade him we gain an asset if he walks he was an FA signing so it doesn't hurt to much if at all.
It will be interesting to see what they do with Mason this summer. I don't see them trusting Hutch though, I think the org is done with him and I think he would likely want to move on as well. I am curious who would be available this off season as a backup.
Not saying you don't go out looking for a backup if needed, I just don't see Comrie being that player unless we see a full season of him reaching a whole other level.
Yeah people are starting to impose their Buff biases here. All I'm saying is that it is extremely extremely unlikely he is about to be traded IMO. I'm not even talking about my own opinion. It's how I read what the team will or won't do.
And we don't need to THIS off season. We are lined up to keep everyone. Except likely Matthias. And we have to make some decisions about Petan, Dano and Tanev. But outside of that we can keep Buff for now. It's the off season after that where things get very tight and having Buff's 7.5 mil, to retain what in my opinion is far more crucial talent for our roster, will be beneficial. Regardless of if the org wants to keep Buff or not they will need to make a very tough decision leading up to the 19/20 season.
Yeah I think we can get Enstrom on the cheap next year but after that he is likely allowed to walk and probably returns to Sweden. I see more of a Myers in Stanley than a Chara. I seriously doubt if he ever becomes much of a defensive force, his skill set is more suited for generating offence.
Even at 3.5, I don't think we can afford Toby, at least not unless someone else has been moved or Morrissey is bridged. I wouldn't be willing to bridge Morrissey in order to get one more mediocre year out of Enstrom.
I see Enstrom out and Niku in for a lot less money. Chiarot is still around for 1 more year as #7. If we pick up a better #7 LD he can be waived.