Zaddy
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2013
- 13,058
- 5,850
The problem is that you insist on having an argument instead of a discussion. You can’t handle people disagreeing with you and claim you’re being attacked. It’s really too much
Oh, the irony is rich with this one. I don't even know why I bother with you honestly. You already showed me this summer what kind of poster you are. The only reason I removed you from my ignore list was that the forums looked wonky and hard to read as you post so much that you're bound to get a lot of replies and those replies don't make a lot of sense without the context of the original post.
But sure, let me show you some examples of you attacking me. Your first post to me was literally this:
I really hate this type of uninformed and narrow minded argument
Bear in mind I hadn't even posted anything in reply to you before this. You started this 'discussion' by mocking my previous post as well as saying it's uninformed and narrow-minded. Not at all hostile, no sir.
You then continue with this nugget where you put words in my mouth:
It’s so stupid when posters judge a player based off their 18/19 year old seasons as if they are finished developing like you are with Jesse.
Then it continues here:
Blatantly false statement.That’s a weak straw man that you just made up.
Again putting words in my mouth and deliberately misunderstanding me and misconstruing my argument.But please continue to write a player off because of his play as a 14-17 year old, seeing as how you just said your problems with him are from long before he was an Oiler.
Again, not at all hostile or attacking in any way, right?Just when it seemed that writing a player off for his play as an 18 year old was the dumbest thing I’ve seen you prove you can eclipse that by writing him off because of his play as a child.
This isn't just one isolated incident either, this is how you argue, or in your terms 'discuss', by deliberately misconstruing the opposing parts arguments and then calling them dumb or stupid.
Don't pretend like you are even remotely interested in having an honest and civil discussion. You're 100% emotionally invested in defending and shielding Puljujärvi from any sort of criticism or even hint at criticism.