It was settled when I first said it in February 2018Is it now settled that he should have definitely been given an extra year in Finland?
It was settled when I first said it in February 2018
Damn, you're the based lord hereI'm pretty sure I first mentioned it in September 2016 so you lose.
Damn, you're the based lord here
What I wouldnt give to have the sheer manliness to make my romanian girlfriend to just shrug off millionaires at cabana in 2011.Had to look up the term based lord on urban dictionary, but I wholeheartedly agree.
Although, I still think Jaffy holds the top spot for his intimidation antics on Subban at Cabanas.
Is it now settled that he should have definitely been given an extra year in Finland?
Is it now settled that he should have definitely been given an extra year in Finland?
MB will probably keep him with the team because of the injuries to Drouin and Byron instead of looking at the bigger picture.
He showed he could handle the NHL last year, so he didn't need an extra year in Finland.
That said it comes down to is whether you are prepared to allow young guys like him to play through the inevitable mistakes/slumps. If you are willing to to keep playing them even when they struggle then there's no problem having them on the team. If on the other hand you are going bench/scratch the guy when he starts struggling, then you shouldn't have brought him up to the NHL.
He showed he could handle the NHL last year, so he didn't need an extra year in Finland.
That said it comes down to is whether you are prepared to allow young guys like him to play through the inevitable mistakes/slumps. If you are willing to to keep playing them even when they struggle then there's no problem having them on the team. If on the other hand you are going bench/scratch the guy when he starts struggling, then you shouldn't have brought him up to the NHL.
Was his dad the head coach there?Is it now settled that he should have definitely been given an extra year in Finland?
Was his dad the head coach there?
I said it last year when things were honky dory and I'll repeat it this year that things have hit the fan, KK is not a #1 C - not even on a lottery team. He just doesn't have the tools. If developed properly he's a #2 with his forte being on the defensive side of the game.KK was drafted to dominate, not handle the NHL.
I'm wondering - is that ideal? Probably not. Might have been a factor in bringing him over. Essentially those were the two options - stay in Asshat or play for the Habs?Yeah, he was fired last year during the season.
KK was drafted to dominate, not handle the NHL.