Dr Love
Registered User
For all of you who are saying that JR is now doing this to make himself look good, did you miss the numerous posts that stated he has been saying this stuff the whole time?
If JR hadn't previously spoken in public about wanting to settle, I'd agree completely that it's a self-serving move. As it is, I genuinely think he's pissed that they've lost a whole season, the fans got screwed, and the players are further behind than they would have been before the season was cancelled.CarlRacki said:I like JR. Really, I do.
However, comments like these (and by other players) about how they're accepting a raw deal for "the good of the game" strikes me as nothing more than a self-serving attempt to make themselves appear to be the good guys in all this.
[/QUOTE]Edit: Might I add that Roenick was put down for trying to circumvent the NHLPA's negociators and getting a deal done for a season last year, which would have given the players billions more over the next CBA than what they're going to sign? I think he has every right to be seriously pissed off.
Beauty said:I'm in an overly optimistic mood! I bet they sign on the dotted line today.
gscarpenter2002 said:Quote:
Originally Posted by gscarpenter2002
You don't need to know about hockey to negotiate a deal like this, really. You need to know about money, contract negotiations, and hockey economics.
Oh....
Well, if that is what you mean, fine. But to that I would say I doubt Gartner knows much in those areas. His only credentials are a hall of fame level playing career and the fact that he interviews well on TV.
OTTSENS said:You're bang on thunderstruck, the players will see in the long haul
that "linkage" is a good thing for them and the league.
OTTSENS said:The only fault I find with the players is that it took them missing a full season before realizing they had made a mistake listen to BG. The player really though what BG was preaching and who could blame them BG had made them a ton of money in the last cba.
But I think the players really want to come back and play, I don't question their love of the game. I for one will not hold a grudge against the players they did what BG told them to do. Like I said before the only mistake they made is to believe everything BG told them blindly.
jericholic19 said:Ok, so I must then concede the players are so stupid and are being lead by a Hitleresque figure who's attempted to bring down the hockey world but failed. YAY, the billionaires won!!!! WOOOHOO! So what's in it for the fans given that if the Blues are still in trouble, other franchises may still face the same hardship? Educate me. I'm intrigued to hear your response.
And how would things have gotten better under the PA's way?jericholic19 said:Ok, so I must then concede the players are so stupid and are being lead by a Hitleresque figure who's attempted to bring down the hockey world but failed. YAY, the billionaires won!!!! WOOOHOO! So what's in it for the fans given that if the Blues are still in trouble, other franchises may still face the same hardship? Educate me. I'm intrigued to hear your response.
FlyersFan10 said:I'm thinking that the vote is going to be real tight and that the players who vote to reject the deal will be the same players who were involved in the lockout back in 1994. This is going to be close.
PecaFan said:I don't see this at all. Ratification isn't going to be tight at all. The vast majority of the players will simply vote based on the recommendation of the union heads. The same as every other union, when the heads say "Vote Yes", it gets ratified, when the heads say "Vote No", it doesn't. Are the PA leaders going to come out and tell the members to vote no? I doubt it.
I see at least 90% yes on this.
Dr Love said:And how would things have gotten better under the PA's way?
anyone that thinks the majority of players are going to be voting "no" is seriously, SERIOUSLY grasping at whatever straws remain.Smail said:Besides, the players have tasted for a full season the "non-NHL" and they don't intend to taste it for another season. The NHL is a notch above the other leagues not just for the level of play, but amenities as well. As well, the players can't wait for the millions to start pouring back to their bank accounts.
Putting on my thinking toque I think that the players may not like this deal but know that the next one won't be any better.jericholic19 said:This post is a joke. It didn't matter who was leading them, they still would have missed a year. In fact, think about this: despite BG having conformed, there are still questions whether or not the players may even ratify the deal. That's how much the players are opposed to the cap and roll back! Think!
What's in it for the fans? What's not in it for the fans? The entire thing was for is the long-term health of the game, the NHL, and the fans. Sure, in the short term it might not seem like the fans will benefit too much because it could take a few years for all the effects to take hold, and it will effect the bigger market teams, so to the point that they will suffer for a bit. But the fact that smaller market teams will now be able to compete, without having to try and out spend the larger market teams for all the league stars, bodes well for everyone in the NHL. You'll finally have all 30 teams with the chance at competing for league titles instead of just 8 or so. It becomes a true Hockey LEAGUE, not the Wings, Av’s, Flyers, Leafs, etc… and 20 little brothers because what will eventually happen is parity. You could have a team not make the playoffs one year that could come out of no where and win the cup (not like they couldn't before the chances will be much higher with the new CBA) the next year. And, in concept, it wont be the same teams, each year. Of course good management of the cap, scouting, and coaching could still realistically keep teams in the upper echelon of the league for extended periods of time, but it's not going to happen with everyone. In the end, that provides intrigue, drama, and will promote interest from new fans. That increases revenues and leads to a healthier league. Isn’t that what should happen?jericholic19 said:YAY, the billionaires won!!!! WOOOHOO! So what's in it for the fans given that if the Blues are still in trouble, other franchises may still face the same hardship? Educate me. I'm intrigued to hear your response.
Levitate said:it seems to kind of be a problem with sports in general that the players really don't pay attention to stuff like CBA negotiations, they just hire someone to do it and then sit back. that looks like what basically happened here...then when they noticed things weren't sailing along fine, they get involved and still end up with a crap deal
if the players took more of an interest in these things and represented themselves better, things would probably work out for them better
This is a ridiculous discussion.jericholic19 said:Ok, so I must then concede the players are so stupid and are being lead by a Hitleresque figure who's attempted to bring down the hockey world but failed. YAY, the billionaires won!!!! WOOOHOO! So what's in it for the fans given that if the Blues are still in trouble, other franchises may still face the same hardship? Educate me. I'm intrigued to hear your response.
PeterSidorkiewicz said:It doesn't necessarily have to be linkage. If the owners win on basically EVERY issue on the CBA, and the players don't really get anything because it seemed like both sides motives were to destroy the other side and not bargain, then I could see a strike at the end of this CBA too. This is just speculation though that its an awful deal for the players all around. That's why I kept saying I want a fair deal so we can avoid this mess for a very long time.