Ripshot 43
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2010
- 13,777
- 10,543
So glad I know not to click the link since you guys took the bullet for me. Sad that I’ve known to avoid Sports Illustrated for years since unnoticed they avoided hockey anyways.
Boy oh boy is that article TERRIBLE
‘A long rebuild with or without Hughes’
"The NHL was different when Jack Hughes was born in 2001: The game was slower, the average skater weighed seven pounds more, the two-line pass existed and the New Jersey Devils turned hockey into a plodding, painful exhibition with the neutral zone trap"
Stupid Article....
In 2001 the Devils scored 295 goals, that would be 2nd in the NHL today only to Tampa's freakish season of 325.
How come the only posters disparaging Hughes are Finns? Do they know something about Jack that we don't??
"The NHL was different when Jack Hughes was born in 2001: The game was slower, the average skater weighed seven pounds more, the two-line pass existed and the New Jersey Devils turned hockey into a plodding, painful exhibition with the neutral zone trap"
Stupid Article....
In 2001 the Devils scored 295 goals, that would be 2nd in the NHL today only to Tampa's freakish season of 325.
"The NHL was different when Jack Hughes was born in 2001: The game was slower, the average skater weighed seven pounds more, the two-line pass existed and the New Jersey Devils turned hockey into a plodding, painful exhibition with the neutral zone trap"
Stupid Article....
In 2001 the Devils scored 295 goals, that would be 2nd in the NHL today only to Tampa's freakish season of 325.
"The world was different when Jack Hughes was born in 2001: Sports Illustrated was a relevant publication..."
Cordell did a decent write up with some stats on like 10 full games he tracked (not a huge sample but still). You’re correct, he is not a pass first player. He took 28% of shot attempts in the games he tracked with primary shot assists on 24% of shots. Very balanced split.Hearing how Hughes is strictly a pass first player seems a bit off base when you watch the videos.
Basically all of his passes are only to players in better positions, and when the pass isn't on, he shoots. It's not like he passing instead of taking A grade scoring chances. Or simply refusing to shoot.
Is it that these players whom always have the puck get labelled this way? as they see the ice so well and find the open man, while a player with less IQ is only thinking shoot, or alternatively, spends a lot of time without the puck waiting for a chance to shoot?
"The NHL was different when Jack Hughes was born in 2001: The game was slower, the average skater weighed seven pounds more, the two-line pass existed and the New Jersey Devils turned hockey into a plodding, painful exhibition with the neutral zone trap"
Stupid Article....
In 2001 the Devils scored 295 goals, that would be 2nd in the NHL today only to Tampa's freakish season of 325.
One thing I have learned from those videos is Hughes will be the best passer on the Devils the day he joins the team.
He might be better by virtue of his preternatural vision and insane skating ability to open up passing lanes, but if you distill passing to its most fundamental, I think Jesper Bratt might have something to say about that.
Well, however it is achieved, "better is better", but the type of nice passes Bratt occasionally makes are essentially routine for Hughes.
This pass is not routine for anyone in the world.
I watched some vid's as well and he seemed very much a playmaker.Hearing how Hughes is strictly a pass first player seems a bit off base when you watch the videos.
Basically all of his passes are only to players in better positions, and when the pass isn't on, he shoots. It's not like he passing instead of taking A grade scoring chances. Or simply refusing to shoot.
Is it that these players whom always have the puck get labelled this way? as they see the ice so well and find the open man, while a player with less IQ is only thinking shoot, or alternatively, spends a lot of time without the puck waiting for a chance to shoot?
I think they mean he isn’t going to pass up a good shooting attempt to force a pass.
Something our forwards do a bit too often.
Well, however it is achieved, "better is better", but the type of nice passes Bratt occasionally makes are essentially routine for Hughes.
I disagree. Anyone who passes as much as Hughes does will 'pass up a good shooting attempt to force a pass'.
I disagree. Anyone who passes as much as Hughes does will 'pass up a good shooting attempt to force a pass'.
Or it could be that when you're the primary line driver and carrying the puck a lot, the best scoring opportunities are more often passes than shots. Players like Hughes draw defenders to themselves and then pass to the open man.
Or it could be that when you're the primary line driver and carrying the puck a lot, the best scoring opportunities are more often passes than shots. Players like Hughes draw defenders to themselves and then pass to the open man.
Spot on
He totally draws coverage and is so shifty and mobile with remarkable passing that he finds the guy no one notices while the opposition gets caught puck watching instead of picking up the guy coasting to a high danger scoring area; aka Caufield