Is the draft lottery working?

Rating:
5/5,
  1. TheOtherOne Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,445
    Likes Received:
    1,248
    Trophy Points:
    154
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Motivation: As a Red Wings fan, I've experienced the entitlement of a team capable of staying competitive for over a decade, followed by the unfamiliar frustration of a team that's not used to being bad. My fanbase is split between those [rightfully] wanting to win games because of pro sports' competitive spirit and pride, and those [rightfully] wanting to tank for the chance at a better future. Notice I called both sides right: I don't blame the fans for their divide, but the system creates it nonetheless.

    Purpose of the lottery: I think the draft and lottery have a couple purposes and I want to analyze whether it's accomplishing them.
    1: Distribute top talent fairly to all teams
    2: Create parity by making the worst teams better
    3: Discourage tanking

    Odds: What I've been hearing a lot lately is "you NEED a top 3 drafted player to compete for a Cup." I'm going to accept that premise without questioning it to simplify things. But it's also important to remember that a top 3 drafted player is obviously not sufficient by itself- you need quality depth and support.

    Lottery odds are, for the last place team for example, 18.5%, 16.5%, 14.4% for 1st, 2nd, 3rd pick. Added up, that's 49.4% chance at a lottery pick.

    The key is that since it's a probability, it doesn't really make sense to look at a single year. It's 50/50, you might win it or you might not. But probabilities work for averaging over time. So the important number is 1/49.4%, which means the last place team will win a top 3 lottery pick on average once in 2.02 years.

    Do this math for all positions, and we see it will take, on average,
    23334455691012152030
    years for a team in a given position to get a lottery pick.
    ** This is the main point of the thread. I think this is a much more useful number to look at than anything else, because it breaks the lottery down and simplifies, with the "prize" being a lottery pick, what it takes to win in terms of time spent as a losing team.

    Additional analysis with some subjectivity...
    I'm going to split non-playoff teams into "bad" 1-7 and "bubble" 8-15.

    - The lottery has been this way since 2016, and we've seen wins by #13, #8, and #12. So out of 9 potential lottery picks, 3 were won by bubble teams. We can see it in the odds and we've seen it happen in reality. When we talk about teams refusing to tank and staying a bubble team forever- such a team will get a lottery pick, on average, once in 14 years, while staying in the better half of non-playoff teams.

    - For bad teams, tanking, or losing a game on purpose, has the potential of changing the expected value by 1. In a given year, it's a crapshoot (out of those 9 potential lottery picks, only 2 were won by bottom 3 teams). But as far as the year-to-year average goes, it doesn't matter much if you're dead last or 4th to last. If you're a bad team for 5 years you should get a lottery pick regardless of your specific standing.

    - The way I see it you can rebuild one of two ways. 1: You can have a bad team with no depth, finish in the bottom half of non-playoff standings, and take on average 3 years to win a lottery pick. Then take several(?) more years to build the surrounding depth necessary to compete for a cup. 2: You can have a bubble team with decent depth but lacking high end talent, finish in the top half of non-playoff standings, and take on average 14 years to win the lottery. From this it seems like method 1 is a bit faster, but there is a lot of fuzziness because no matter which way you choose, everything has to go right. I'd like to encourage method 2 (i.e. discourage "tanking" even more), but maybe the lottery odds need to be adjusted some more for that to happen.

    Ok I already spent too much time on this so go ahead hfboards tear it apart if you want.
     
  2. ibleedkings Make Kings Great Again! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Santa Clarita
    Hell no it’s not working. The Kings were completely f***ed last night!
     
  3. oXo Cube Termite

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    In your closet
    It hasn't prevented a single team from entering a rebuilding period and it has screwed over multiple teams that are/were legitimately bad and need the most help.

    So no, it isn't working. It's making things worse.
     
  4. BPD Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    410
    Trophy Points:
    124
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    New York City
    Premise is nice, but your n is literally 9.

    You're operating under the assumption that the distribution is not going to skew toward outliers early. 13 and 12 winning one of those spots twice in 9 is certainly unexpected, it's not unusual.
     
  5. Devilsfan118 There goes my SHERO, watch him as he trades. Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    Trophy Points:
    139
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    Manayunk (Rutgers, in spirit)
    Teams that have benefitted from the system: Absolutely.

    Teams that have not: No way.

    /thread.
     
  6. Nick0930 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    365
    Trophy Points:
    94
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Occupation:
    Store Manager
    Location:
    Quebec
    It's fine.

    - Devils fan
     
  7. FourRings Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,360
    Likes Received:
    903
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    New York City
    I don't think a team should be able to win the lottery twice within a 5 year period. I'm not just saying that because NJ won, just my honest opinion.
     
  8. Barrie22 Shark fan in hiding

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    21,688
    Likes Received:
    3,019
    Trophy Points:
    187
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Occupation:
    hockey lol
    Location:
    ontario
    Why because they moved back 2 spots?
     
    Oryxo, llamateizer, HabsQC and 4 others like this.
  9. Kaapo Cabana Next name: Admiral Kakkbar

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,056
    Likes Received:
    2,385
    Trophy Points:
    126
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    This is a very good point

    also, the aim of the Lottery is to reduce teams intentionally putting out bad rosters in order to get a better draft position. Because we don't know if any teams would have operated differently had the draft been strict reverse order, we cannot measure its efficacy.

    BUT

    Just because you can't measure its efficacy doesn't mean its not effective. Being at the bottom of the league is less of a meal ticket than it was before. in theory, this should discourage tanking.
     
  10. bossram Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Messages:
    6,134
    Likes Received:
    1,424
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Yet people didn't like the old system because the same teams (EDM) kept getting 1st overalls.

    The point of the more evenly distributed lottery is to allow for rebuilding, but discourage outright tanking a la the 2014-15 Buffalo Sabres' McDavid quest. If people thought the team in dead last needed the most help, and deserved the first overall, then the system should never have changed. But it did, because everyone got pissy over Edmonton.
     
    Perfect_Drug and MC2D like this.
  11. chi777 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,486
    Likes Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    101
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    I think it's a disgrace. I have a feeling when execs from the NFL watch this they fall out of their chairs laughing.

    It should just go back to drafting players in the order of the standings. Worst drafts first, and so on.

    This tanking concern is so overblown it makes me sad.

    When you're a team, with a bunch of aging vets, on the downswing, there's two ways to handle it.

    You can hang on to those vets and wait for them to leave on their own, like Detroit. In this case you end up getting nothing for them when they retire.

    Or you can trade them off and hope to get some assets for them before they hang 'em up. Like Buffalo tried to do, but failed miserably.

    Either way, both end up at the bottom of the standings and neither should be punished for being terrible.

    This whole lottery thing is a travesty.
     
  12. LostToAZamboniDriver Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    46,291
    Likes Received:
    8,869
    Trophy Points:
    157
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    Toronto
    Yes, it's working. It deters tanking. Any team that misses the playoffs can win it but you aren't guaranteed a top 2 pick just because you finished last.

    If you draft well...you can get good players anywhere in the draft. Islanders got Barzal, Boston got McAvoy and Pastrnak, Detroit got Larkin...all great players, all after the top 10 picks in the draft.
     
    bigtim1988, TonyDay, blankall and 3 others like this.
  13. oXo Cube Termite

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    In your closet
    Yes.

    I'm saying that non-Edmonton GMs throwing a hissy fit over a small sample statistical outlier of Edmonton wins was stupid and has made things worse for everyone.
     
  14. Hennessy Blank Space

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    11,830
    Likes Received:
    2,301
    Trophy Points:
    235
    SB Cash:
    $ 334,692
    Occupation:
    Marmot Hustler
    Location:
    On my keister
    Taylor Hall is satisfied.
     
  15. ibleedkings Make Kings Great Again! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Santa Clarita
    Three spots. Kings had a horrible year and could of really benefited from kakko or Hughes to help the rebuild.
     
  16. Getz2noone Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    21,799
    Likes Received:
    8,788
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    You guys suck at the lottery almost as bad as you do at hockey.

    :naughty:
     
  17. Palpatine Fire Everyone

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    20,278
    Likes Received:
    1,253
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    Toronto
    I'm sure if the Kings won the lottery, you'd have a different opinion...

    In fact, the only people pissed about it are the ones who's teams fell back a few spots. This is how a lottery works people. Everyone was asking to have a system in place that wouldn't encourage tanking, and now that it's finally here, people want to revert back.
     
  18. AlwaysSunnyInTampa LOLZ! This friggin sucks dude!

    Joined:
    May 17, 2014
    Messages:
    23,235
    Likes Received:
    7,386
    Trophy Points:
    156
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    No. The Senators and Kings are going to continue to decline and will get far worse over the next several years unless lady luck gives them a kiss come lottery day
     
    dukeofjive and MacBradley like this.
  19. ibleedkings Make Kings Great Again! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Santa Clarita

    I’m mean literally the worst case scenario happened last night to the kings. Straight bullshit
     
  20. Rangers79 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    190
    Trophy Points:
    61
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Not that the Kings tanked intentionally, cause I don't think they did, but I'm fine with some teams who tank intentionally or are run like crap not getting rewarded for that. I mean I could be wrong about teams tanking intentionally but it certainly seems that way
     
    MacBradley and DirkStraun like this.
  21. Flowah Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    10,249
    Likes Received:
    538
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    You guys call it tanking. I call it rebuilding. Most of the time they look identical.
    • What do you do when you rebuild? You stockpile picks and prospects.
    • How do you do that? You trade players.
    • What kind of players do other teams want? The good ones.
    • What does that do to your team? It makes it suck more.
    And honestly, who cares if Edmonton got all those 1sts. They still suck hardcore. What good is 1OA if you still suck?

    I feel like they changed the system because it didn't seem "fair" that Edmonton got 1OA so many times, without considering that it didn't really help them that much. And they've had to trade away good players because you can't afford to keep all your 1OA players when it's time for them to get paid.
     
    ek93, dukeofjive, CPTN71 and 4 others like this.
  22. New Jersey trenton makes, the world takes

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    23,774
    Likes Received:
    2,889
    Trophy Points:
    186
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    databases
    Location:
    soprano turf
    Home Page:
  23. ibleedkings Make Kings Great Again! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    169
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Santa Clarita

    I’d be a lot happier that’s for sure.
     
  24. Spilot23 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    2,424
    Likes Received:
    1,669
    Trophy Points:
    109
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    Absolutely not. - Signed every Avs fans and Joe Sakic :(
    [​IMG]
     
    iamjs, Nakunako, blinkman360 and 7 others like this.
  25. ElLeetch Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2018
    Messages:
    1,050
    Likes Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    84
    SB Cash:
    $ 200,000
    hard to feel bad for a team just coming off of two recent cup wins, anchored by a #2OA on D.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"