Is Stevens hit on lindros a suspension in todays nhl?

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Breakfast of Champs, Mar 23, 2011.

  1. Breakfast of Champs

    Breakfast of Champs Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,386
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Student
    Would stevens be suspended for the infamous/famous hit on eric lindros?
     
  2. jkrx

    jkrx Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4,337
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    wasn't that hit basically a north-to-south hit or maybe Steven came up a bit from the side. I don't think that hit would have been a offense today. The Kariya hit is in that case closer to a suspensionable hit.
     
  3. Crosbyfan

    Crosbyfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    11,223
    Likes Received:
    788
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Arguably targeted the head. I guess it would depend on the day of the week that it happened.
     
  4. kmad

    kmad riot survivor

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    34,119
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Yup.

    "How is Stevens allowed in the NHL? Something has to be done to protect the integrity of the game!"
     
  5. Epsilon

    Epsilon #basta

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    48,464
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    South Cackalacky
    It's definitely on the borderline of what would be allowed. A better example of a headshot Lindros took that would (or at least should) be legal under the new rules is the one Kasparitis layed on him, that was almost completely a head-on collision (no pun intended).
     
  6. Ola

    Ola Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    25,906
    Likes Received:
    2,202
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lawyer
    Location:
    Sweden
    Yeah, its a lot more problematic then many pretend.

    There are many dirty hits in this league. But I think that a D standing up a forward at a blueline always should be deemed a hockey hit (unless there are elbows involved). I mean, if the forward is prepaired to get hit he'll turn and take the hit with the shoulder. Its only when the forward is looking at the puck we see injurys.

    And "targeting the head" in that situation?

    I don't know, I played 3rd tier hockey untill I was 21 y/o. IE, I am hardly Scott Stevens. But when I played and made hits like that, where you stepped up against a forward coming at you at full speed, you take a decision and within a blink of an eye bodis, your own included, are flying all over the place.

    I am seriously not sure that Steven's actually targeted the head. It was big hits no matter what.
     
  7. Psycho Papa Joe

    Psycho Papa Joe Porkchop Hoser

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    23,347
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Forensic Accountant
    Location:
    Cesspool, Ontario
    Home Page:
    Not a blindside hit.
    Not late.
    Didn't leave his feat.
    All shoulder.

    Not illegal by today's rules.
     
  8. Prophecy35

    Prophecy35 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My thoughts exactly.
     
  9. Blizzard

    Blizzard Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My personal opinion is that it should be allowed and is perfectly legal in my mind but I disagree with most of you that it would not result in a suspension in todays kinder, gentler NHL for two reasons:

    1) The injury that resulted from the hit. Recently, when a player goes down the arm almost instantly comes up and when it is questionable if it was a "head shot" or not the recent calls have usually resulted in 5 and a game with a league review to follow.

    2) Listening to many of the GM's at the recent meetings I heard over and over again about hits on vulnerable players who were already "engaged" with another player. From what I remember of that hit there could be an argument that he was already engaged with one, if not two, Devils before Stevens lowered the boom on him.

    This doesn't even take into account the heat the NHL is under right now and if a "star" like Lindros went down today because of this hit I would almost guarantee a suspension.

    Myself, I would love to see guys like Stevens and Marchment still around, if for no other reason, just so I could watch the tears flow on the main board.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2011
  10. kmad

    kmad riot survivor

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    34,119
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Vancouver
    You are a gentleman and a scholar.
     
  11. No it was clean. It was just really, really hard and Lindros had his head down not expecting it.
     
  12. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,488
    Likes Received:
    1,756
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    I don't think the fact that lindros was a star would have made the NHL come down hard on Stevens. People forget just how much lindros was hated around the league - it would be more like pronger getting taken out than Crosby, but lindros got even more bad press than pronger.
     
  13. Hank Chinaski

    Hank Chinaski Registered User

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    19,295
    Likes Received:
    719
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    YFO
    Awards:
    Agreed on every count.

    On the topic of Lindros, a much better litmus test would be the hit he laid on Dackell back in '98. That met (or should I say broke) every criteria you mentioned above. It was from behind into the glass, a good second and a half after the puck left Dackell's stick, he left his feet, and followed through with a bit of an elbow.

    Back then, Lindros didn't even receive a penalty. Today, I fully expect this site would've crashed had he not received at least 5 games.
     
  14. Andrew Knoll

    Andrew Knoll Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Voyager to Lovetron
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Home Page:
    Not today but soon enough; it won't be long before hits targeting the head will be illegal and rather than looking at angles the challenge will be determining intent.
     
  15. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,488
    Likes Received:
    1,756
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    Good luck determining 'intent.'. I really hope that's not a rule. Otherwise you'll get a 'did chara intend to steer his head into it?" ****show every few weeks.
     
  16. Blizzard

    Blizzard Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You mean we don't now?
     
  17. CHGoalie27

    CHGoalie27 GWAAARRRRRRR

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    12,332
    Likes Received:
    599
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    SoFLA
    Damn near all of Steven's headshots were of the "He shoulda been looking where he was skating" category...

    Anyone have a clip of someone talking to a friend and then walking into a pole? I want to blame the pole.
     
  18. NewFang

    NewFang Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    6,990
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    86
    So as long as I'm in front of a guy I can direct my shoulder into his head/face and it's legal? I just don't think it would fly with the focus on headshots right now.
     
  19. tarheelhockey

    tarheelhockey Highest Boss

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    57,961
    Likes Received:
    34,000
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    The Triangle
    I think it's a clean hit, but considering the current emphasis on headshots and the lack of consistency in the league office, it would probably result in a suspension.

    Think about it this way... if Doughty hit Crosby that way, you think he's going to walk scott free? Not a chance.
     
  20. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,363
    Likes Received:
    523
    Trophy Points:
    229
    I agree with you, and the true fan does as well because this is how hockey is played.

    However, we've seen the media analyze and calculate every single hit nowadays. We all know the schools of people who wanted to hang Chara. But for some reason in 2011 the onus is NEVER on the guy with the puck skating with his head down which is something Lindros ALWAYS did. I have little doubt there would be a huge movement to suspend Stevens for 20 games for that hit. There would be people calling for that, and they'd be wrong.

    At the speed hockey moves it is impossible to tell grown men trying to keep their job that if an opponent's head catches your shoulder then you're out! We've seen first hand how this has softened up the NFL with a linebacker having 0.5 seconds to react to stopping a first down but then try and not to graze the player's helmet. So the way the rule is enforced is fine. Stevens' hit was fine in 2000 and fine in 2011. However, sadly there would be armchair athletes all over the world that would want Stevens' head on a stick.
     
  21. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,488
    Likes Received:
    1,756
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    You're basically saying that open ice hits on players with their heads down should be illegal, unless the player making the hit somehow crouches really low.

    Edit- thankfully, that isn't the rule just yet.
     
  22. TheDevilMadeMe

    TheDevilMadeMe Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,488
    Likes Received:
    1,756
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    Awards:
    I really don't get the crosby comparisons. Crosby is the nhl's golden boy. Lindros was still the dark sheep of the league, even in 2000.
     
  23. Blizzard

    Blizzard Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Agreed and if this is what the NHL is coming to then instead of "headshots" we are back to careers being ended by "kneeshots". Rule 44 is backburner to Rule 48 right now but from the way it looks in a few years it will be back in the forefront along with the reemergence hip checks. Can't go high so go low. From what I read and hear these days somehow going to the knees is less career threatening and "not as dirty". I would disagree but who am I to argue with the flavor of the month?
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2011
  24. Dennis Bonvie

    Dennis Bonvie Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Messages:
    13,947
    Likes Received:
    965
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Unknown
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I think the Campbell hit on Umberger is the best example of a Stevens-like hit but without targeting the head as Stevens did. I don't think Umberger noticed the fine distinction, though.
     
  25. Mr Atoz*

    Mr Atoz* Guest

    Scott Stevens was allowed to get away with hits no one else was allowed to get away with. His elbows and forearms were called shoulders. His deliberate hits to the head were mystically clean. He feigned shock and surprise when his identical premeditated hits to the head caused injuries. He was one of the dirtiest players of his time. Yet some defend him like he was their son.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"