blue82
BELEAF (win or lose)
Gunnar has never been good enough for the top pair.
like a broken record, on and on we go...lol
Gunnar has never been good enough for the top pair.
Gardiner has been steller for the last 12 games. He's averaged 23 minutes of ice time, and has found his offensive game.It was 1 game against a team that had to travel after playing the night prior.
How many of those minutes were match up minutes?
Carlyle has issues with Gardiners defensive game (and rightfully so) so using him to match up against top players like Ovi, Nash, Speeza just seems flawed to me.
Undoubtedly Dion Phaneuf and Carl Gunnarsson have been shutting down other teams top lines, they work well together and are extremely effective.
The problem comes with our 2nd pairing, it seems like other then those 2 guys, no one else can handle tough competition. So do we split up Dion and Carl? Balance the top4 pairings?
Maybe something like this can work.
Dion - Gardiner
Franson - Gunnarsson
These pairings can either show 1 of 2 things.
1. Dion Phaneuf is better then expected and is still getting the job done with a less capable partner. Top 4 is looking good.
2. Dion and Carl had good chemistry, breaking them up was a bad idea, both pairings are struggling.
*Rielly is out of the question for Dion's partner, too early to be seeing that kind of competition.
Came here to say this.Against a team like the Habs, with no clear top line, it could be worth the gamble.
Would love to see:
Rielly - Phaneuf
Gardiner - Gunnar
as the top 4.
and then Fraser/Ranger - Franson as the bottom pair.
But if we're playing a team with a dominant top line, it's probably best to keep Gunnar-Phaneuf together.